2 packs: 15% off with code BUY2. 3 or more: 20% off with code BUY3.

Free PMI PMP Practice Questions

169 free PMI PMP practice questions from the CertStash pack of 741, each with the correct answer and a full explanation. The rule is the same for every exam: ten free on the product page, 169 free here, all 741 in the pack, and each step includes the one before it.

Question 1

A team has just adopted an agile approach. During daily standup meetings, the team expressed concerns about task delays. The project leader worked with the product owner to get clarity on the features. The project leader asked the team to fast-track all product features to ensure delivery. Sprints are being completed but with either fewer features or low quality.

What should the project leader have done to ensure success?

  1. Asked the team to create an impediment log and keep it updated for use in the next sprint planning
  2. Directed teams to possible solutions that help in removing the impediments and contribute to a timely delivery
  3. Suggested to the team to add impediments as work items in the product backlog to be fixed in the next sprints
  4. Empowered the team to improve their processes, tools, and interactions to be more effective in delivery and removing impediments
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Empowered the team to improve their processes, tools, and interactions to be more effective in delivery and removing impediments

In agile environments, the project leader should empower the team to identify and resolve their own impediments rather than directing solutions from above. By enabling the team to improve their processes, tools, and interactions, they become self-organizing and can find sustainable solutions. Fast-tracking without addressing root causes leads to quality issues and burnout, as evidenced in the scenario. Empowered teams drive continuous improvement and better delivery outcomes.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Creating an impediment log alone documents problems but doesn't solve them or empower the team to improve their processes.
  • B. Directing solutions from leadership undermines team self-organization and agile principles, treating symptoms rather than root causes.
  • C. Adding impediments as backlog items defers resolution and doesn't address the immediate need to unblock the team's ability to deliver quality work.

Question 2

A project manager is part of a team that is launching a series of features to comply with a new regulation. The team has only 6 weeks to release the features to the legacy applications. During the standup meeting, a software engineer indicated that the development of an important feature is on hold until the assigned designer completes a specific task. This delay is a serious road block to meeting the release date.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Meet with the design team manager to inform them of the current status and request an additional designer
  2. Ask the software engineer to move forward without completing the important feature
  3. Contact the design team manager and ask to reconsider the priority list based on the latest situation
  4. Meet with the designer to share the current status and develop a solution to complete the task
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Meet with the designer to share the current status and develop a solution to complete the task

The project manager should meet directly with the designer who is causing the bottleneck to understand the situation, share the critical deadline context, and collaboratively develop a solution. This approach respects the designer's expertise, demonstrates the business impact, and fosters problem-solving partnership. Solutions might include task restructuring, additional support, or process adjustments. Direct engagement is more effective than going through managers or asking engineers to work around the issue.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Involving the design team manager adds hierarchy and delays without directly addressing the blocking issue or understanding the designer's constraints.
  • B. Asking the engineer to proceed without the important feature defeats the purpose and doesn't solve the underlying dependency problem.
  • C. Asking the design manager to reprioritize without understanding the specific constraint is premature and may not address the real bottleneck.

Question 3

A project manager is working with a customer's team on a new project. Some product definitions and requirements are still not clear, but the customer wants to start activities as soon as possible. The organization is also expecting product delivery for a specific date due to a regulatory requirement. Due to the nature of the project, the project manager has decided to use a hybrid approach.

Why did the project manager choose a hybrid approach?

  1. A hybrid approach will enable project activities to start immediately and allow for a plan for the requirements definitions
  2. A hybrid approach will allow the project manager to revise the product specifications
  3. A hybrid approach will allow for management of the requirement uncertainties as well as the date restriction
  4. A hybrid approach will ensure the delivery date is accomplished and will eliminate product uncertainties
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. A hybrid approach will allow for management of the requirement uncertainties as well as the date restriction

A hybrid approach is ideal for this scenario because it combines predictive elements (handling the fixed regulatory delivery date) with adaptive elements (managing unclear requirements). The hybrid model allows some activities to begin immediately using predictive planning while concurrently using iterative methods to refine and clarify requirements as they emerge. This addresses both constraints: time certainty and requirement uncertainty.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While hybrid does enable starting activities, it's incomplete, this option doesn't acknowledge that the hybrid approach specifically addresses the regulatory deadline constraint.
  • B. A hybrid approach doesn't necessarily revise specifications; it manages them through iterative clarification.
  • D. No approach can eliminate uncertainties; hybrid manages them through adaptive planning while maintaining date commitments.

Question 4

Five agile teams working together on a product recently performed release planning. Midway through the project, each team showed that their progress was on track.

When all of the teams integrated at the product level, many integration issues were observed. The overall product release progress declined with predictions showing the committed content will not be able to be accomplished.

What should the project manager have done differently?

  1. Performed a Scrum of Scrums on a regular basis to help the teams remove impediments
  2. Formed a separate quality assurance team to test all items coming from each team at the end of each sprint
  3. Arranged an online session on the integration concept and suggested tools to the teams
  4. Ensured frequent and continuous integration of work to obtain early feedback and continuous learning
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Ensured frequent and continuous integration of work to obtain early feedback and continuous learning

In a multi-team agile environment, integration issues arise when teams work in silos and only integrate late in the cycle. Frequent and continuous integration of work across teams provides early feedback on compatibility, dependencies, and conflicts, enabling teams to detect and resolve integration problems immediately rather than discovering them at release time. This approach supports the agile principle of continuous learning and adaptation.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While Scrum of Scrums helps with impediment removal, it doesn't directly address the root cause of late-stage integration failures.
  • B. A separate QA team testing at the end of each sprint still represents late integration rather than continuous integration of work.
  • C. Training on tools alone doesn't solve the fundamental problem of lack of integration frequency and feedback loops.

Question 5

A project manager is managing a construction project that is facing challenges. There is schedule overrun, cost overrun, and the client is unhappy with the specific scope progress.

What should the project manager do first?

  1. Review the scope and project objectives.
  2. Enforce the penalty clause on the supplier.
  3. Take action to reduce the cost overrun.
  4. Work with the client on the scope completion.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Review the scope and project objectives.

When a project faces multiple challenges (schedule, cost, and scope issues), the project manager must first understand the root causes by reviewing scope and project objectives. This foundational analysis determines what went wrong and informs all subsequent corrective actions. Acting on cost reduction or scope completion without this understanding may address symptoms rather than causes and could worsen the situation.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Enforcing penalty clauses is a reactive measure that doesn't address the underlying project problems or help recover performance.
  • C. Reducing costs without understanding scope issues may compromise deliverables further or violate contractual commitments.
  • D. Working on scope completion without reviewing objectives may compound problems if scope creep or misalignment exists.

Question 6

In a geographically distributed project team, the project team members continue to email status reports and update schedules after their weekly meeting discussions. However, the team is having difficulty tracking the changes and progress made.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Facilitate training on version control and project artifacts.
  2. Maintain separate document control via regions to avoid discrepancies.
  3. Maintain a central repository of artifacts with a version control system.
  4. Develop a document management software for version control.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Maintain a central repository of artifacts with a version control system.

In geographically distributed teams, maintaining a central repository with version control is essential to prevent multiple versions, conflicts, and tracking issues. A centralized system ensures all team members access the latest artifacts, eliminates regional silos, tracks changes systematically, and provides a single source of truth regardless of location.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While training helps, it does not solve the structural problem of lacking a proper centralized system for artifacts.
  • B. Maintaining separate repositories by region perpetuates the discrepancies problem rather than solving it.
  • D. Developing new software is unnecessary when established version control systems already solve this problem efficiently.

Question 7

A project manager is managing a large project. A stakeholder has just discovered a new risk that has not been identified in earlier stages.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Confirm to the stakeholder that the risk register has been completed and validated by all stakeholders
  2. Perform a risk analysis directly with the stakeholder who raised the risk and update the risk register
  3. Communicate the risk to the steering committee and request a mitigation plan from senior management
  4. Add the risk to the risk register and reevaluate the register with help from the project team and stakeholders
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Add the risk to the risk register and reevaluate the register with help from the project team and stakeholders

Risk management is an ongoing process, not a one-time activity. When new risks are discovered at any stage, they should be added to the risk register and evaluated collaboratively with the project team and stakeholders. This ensures comprehensive risk coverage, leverages collective knowledge, and maintains an accurate, current risk profile for informed decision-making.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Dismissing newly discovered risks by claiming validation is complete contradicts best practice and ignores valuable stakeholder input.
  • B. Analyzing the risk only with the discovering stakeholder limits perspective and misses insights the broader team could provide.
  • C. Routing directly to the steering committee bypasses the project team's role in risk analysis and escalates prematurely without initial evaluation.

Question 8

A project manager is closing a project and preparing to hand it over to the operations team. During handover, a delayed invoice was submitted with a higher-than-planned cost against the project work. Consequently, project handover was delayed and the project's reported completion costs were increased.

What should the project manager have done to avoid this situation?

  1. Notified all vendors about the invoicing and nonpayment deadlines
  2. Reviewed the total committed cost against the cost invoiced at project closing
  3. Involved the finance team and discussed the issue with the vendor
  4. Captured and reviewed all of the project work and related costs regularly
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Captured and reviewed all of the project work and related costs regularly

The project manager should have captured and reviewed all project work and related costs regularly throughout the project lifecycle, not just at closing. Ongoing cost monitoring would have identified invoicing delays and discrepancies before handover, enabling proactive resolution and preventing project closure delays. This preventive approach is superior to reactive measures after the fact.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Notifying vendors of deadlines addresses only part of the problem and doesn't ensure active monitoring of invoices received.
  • B. Reviewing committed versus invoiced costs only at project closing is too late to prevent the handover delay.
  • C. Involving finance and discussing with vendors after the problem occurs is reactive rather than preventive.

Question 9

A project manager is assigned to a critical software development project. The team is using a hybrid approach and has divided development into four sprints. At the end of sprint three, the project manager discovers that the earned value (EV) is US$500,000 and the planned value (PV) is US$550,000.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Fast track the project
  2. Adjust the budget
  3. Introduce a float
  4. Adjust the project time line
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Fast track the project

When EV ($500,000) is less than PV ($550,000), the project is behind schedule. This is a schedule variance situation requiring corrective action. Fast tracking, compressing the schedule by doing activities in parallel or overlapping them, is the appropriate response to recover from schedule delays. The project is underperforming against the planned timeline and needs acceleration to get back on track.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Budget adjustment addresses cost variance, not schedule variance; EV vs PV indicates a schedule issue.
  • C. Introducing float increases schedule flexibility but does not address the current behind-schedule condition.
  • D. Adjusting the timeline would extend the delay rather than recover from it; fast tracking is needed instead.

Question 10

A project manager is reviewing the requirements of a large program.

Which requirements should the project team prioritize to avoid getting fines?

  1. Certifying sustainable products
  2. Establishing company processes
  3. Complying with new regulations
  4. Developing new product lines
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Complying with new regulations

Compliance with new regulations is a legal and mandatory requirement. Non-compliance results in fines, legal penalties, and organizational risk. This must be the highest priority among the options given. Sustainable products (A), company processes (B), and new product lines (D) are all valuable but optional initiatives. Only regulatory compliance is non-negotiable and directly tied to avoiding fines.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Sustainable products are beneficial but optional and do not typically carry legal penalty requirements.
  • B. Establishing company processes supports operations but is not legally mandated like regulatory compliance.
  • D. New product lines are growth initiatives that do not directly address legal or fine-avoidance requirements.

What people say about the full PMP pack 5.0 from 11

Excellent resource for anyone who wants to pass without wasting time. Certstash is 100% recommended.
Thomas BlakePMP
Luckily I discovered this website before the exam and I managed to pass it with these questions. 90% of the questions were in the exam. Their exam dumps saved me. Highly recommended.
Henry snowPMP
Passed with this. Cheap and effective.
MattPMP

Question 11

During the third iteration of a project, the main sponsor retired from the company, and a new sponsor was appointed. The new sponsor is not familiar with the agile approach for project delivery, which leads them to request more control over the project team.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Schedule a meeting with the new sponsor in order to explain the agile approach and how teams are supposed to be self-organized
  2. Review the sponsor's request with the project team during the next daily review meeting in order to provide the requested control
  3. Schedule an emergency meeting with the project team so they fulfill every request that comes from the sponsor
  4. Review the sponsor's request with the project team during the next iteration review meeting in order to obtain a team decision
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Schedule a meeting with the new sponsor in order to explain the agile approach and how teams are supposed to be self-organized

When a new sponsor unfamiliar with agile joins mid-project, the project manager should proactively educate them about agile principles and self-organizing teams rather than compromising the agile approach. This prevents friction and helps the sponsor understand why traditional command-and-control doesn't apply in agile environments. Education and alignment upfront is the best preventive measure.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Bringing sponsor requests to a daily standup (which focuses on tactical progress) rather than addressing the fundamental misunderstanding about agile governance is ineffective.
  • C. Capitulating to every sponsor request defeats the purpose of self-organizing teams and undermines the agile methodology the project has been following.
  • D. While iteration reviews involve stakeholders, using them to decide whether to honor a sponsor's governance request dodges the PM's responsibility to educate and establish proper expectations.

Question 12

A major public-transportation construction project is aimed at significantly reducing emissions. The project has been severely delayed due to noncompliance with environmental codes and bylaws.

What should the project manager have done to prevent this?

  1. Appointed a senior environmental compliance officer to report directly to the project manager.
  2. Approached the regulator for a partial waiver in light of the environmental importance of the project.
  3. Incorporated sufficient schedule reserves based on similar delays in past projects.
  4. Mapped environmental compliance requirements, identified risks to achieving them, and prepared mitigations.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Mapped environmental compliance requirements, identified risks to achieving them, and prepared mitigations.

To prevent delays from environmental code noncompliance, the project manager should have mapped environmental compliance requirements, identified risks to achieving them, and prepared mitigations. This proactive risk management approach identifies compliance requirements early, recognizes where delays are likely, and develops contingency plans. This is the standard PM practice for managing known regulatory constraints and is far superior to reactive measures taken after delays occur.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Appointing a compliance officer doesn't prevent delays if compliance risks aren't proactively identified and mitigated.
  • B. Requesting a waiver is unreliable and may not be granted; prevention through planning is the proper approach.
  • C. Schedule reserves alone don't prevent noncompliance; the actual compliance work and risks must be planned.

Question 13

An equipment vendor will implement a new production line for a client company. The year-long project will include 2- to 4-month long iterations; however, the client's project manager has no agile experience.

How should the project manager ensure that the client is effectively represented in the daily meetings?

  1. Recommend agile training programs that best suit the client project manager's schedule.
  2. Propose a session for essential agile knowledge transfer for the client team to align with the daily meeting goals.
  3. Realign the project to a predictive approach to ensure optimal collaboration between the teams.
  4. Provide the client project manager with agile best practice documents and web resources.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Propose a session for essential agile knowledge transfer for the client team to align with the daily meeting goals.

The client project manager lacks agile experience but must effectively participate in daily agile meetings. Proposing a focused knowledge transfer session on essential agile concepts directly addresses this skills gap and aligns team understanding with the specific meeting goals. This targeted, practical approach ensures the client PM can contribute meaningfully to daily meetings without requiring a full training program or disrupting the project timeline. Knowledge transfer specific to daily meeting goals creates immediate value and builds competence for the current project context.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While training programs are valuable, they may be too lengthy and general for someone who needs to be effective in daily meetings immediately.
  • C. Realigning to predictive approach abandons the iterative structure already planned and fails to help the client adapt to agile.
  • D. Simply providing documents and resources without structured knowledge transfer is unlikely to ensure the client PM can effectively participate in daily meetings.

Question 14

A project team has installed software for the client, passed the knowledge to operations, sent the final report, and celebrated. Then 1 week later, the client sends a list of requirements that have not been met. The client is requesting to fix the issues quickly and within the initial budget.

What should the project manager have done to prevent this from happening?

  1. Reviewed the acceptance criteria and obtained client approval.
  2. Allocated a risk budget for any post-release improvements.
  3. Conducted a pilot to understand the client's performance parameters.
  4. Established meetings with the client throughout the project phases.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Reviewed the acceptance criteria and obtained client approval.

The core problem is that requirements were not clearly defined or agreed upon upfront. By reviewing acceptance criteria with the client and obtaining their explicit approval before development, the project manager would have caught the gap between the team's understanding and the client's actual needs. This preventive measure ensures alignment on what 'done' means and prevents post-release surprises.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. A risk budget addresses cost overruns but doesn't prevent the fundamental issue of unmet requirements.
  • C. A pilot helps understand performance but doesn't prevent requirements clarification issues.
  • D. Meetings throughout phases help but are less specific than formally reviewing and approving acceptance criteria with the client.

Question 15

A new team member has joined an agile project, replacing a team member who recently left. The project team needs the new team member to speed up their ability to contribute effectively to the project.

What should the project manager do to help in this situation?

  1. Assign the new team member the same tasks that were assigned to the previous team member who they replaced
  2. Schedule knowledge transfer sessions and assign less complex tasks to the new team member
  3. Send technical documentation to the new team member and schedule training for the next iteration
  4. Have the new team member complete all of the company's mandatory training
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Schedule knowledge transfer sessions and assign less complex tasks to the new team member

Scheduling knowledge transfer sessions with experienced team members and assigning progressively complex tasks is the most effective agile onboarding approach. This combines direct learning with practical experience at an appropriate pace, allowing the new member to contribute effectively while building competency and confidence.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Immediately assigning the same complex tasks as the previous team member sets up the new member for failure without proper ramp-up.
  • C. Delaying hands-on work until the next iteration wastes the current sprint and delays the team member's contribution to the project.
  • D. Requiring completion of all mandatory training first creates administrative delays and postpones productive project contribution unnecessarily.

Question 16

An agile team member received certification on a new tool; however, this team member is complaining that the rest of the team is not using the tool due to lack of knowledge.

How should the servant leader apply emotional intelligence to leverage this situation to benefit the project?

  1. Request budget to reward the team member so others will be motivated to obtain the same certification.
  2. Promote the team member to product owner to leverage the new knowledge with the clients.
  3. Ask the team member to use their recently acquired knowledge to develop and provide training to the team.
  4. Provide an incentive to team members who begin using the new tool on this project.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Ask the team member to use their recently acquired knowledge to develop and provide training to the team.

A servant leader with emotional intelligence recognizes that the certified team member is a valuable resource and the team's knowledge gap is an opportunity for growth. Asking the team member to share their expertise through training develops the team collectively, builds psychological safety, creates ownership of the new tool adoption, and leverages the investment already made in certification. This approach develops team capability sustainably.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Financial incentives for the certified member while others lack knowledge creates division and doesn't address the knowledge transfer need.
  • B. Promoting to product owner is a structural change unrelated to solving the tool knowledge gap and may be inappropriate.
  • D. Incentivizing tool use without providing training sets up failure and does not solve the root cause of lack of knowledge.

Question 17

The project velocity has recently slipped, and a decision was made to skip testing to increase the momentum and bong the project back on track.

What will the project manager need to focus on as a result of this decision?

  1. Increased bum rate
  2. Increased cost
  3. Increased technical debt
  4. Decreased efficiency
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Increased technical debt

Skipping testing to accelerate project velocity creates technical debt, which represents the accumulated cost of poor quality decisions that must be addressed later. When testing is bypassed, undetected defects and architectural issues accumulate, requiring future rework, maintenance, and remediation efforts. This decision prioritizes short-term schedule gains over long-term project health and sustainability, ultimately creating significant future costs and complications.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While burn rate may be affected, it's not the primary or most significant consequence of skipping testing.
  • B. Cost may increase due to future rework, but technical debt is the more direct and fundamental consequence.
  • D. Efficiency typically decreases overall due to the need for future rework and defect correction caused by skipped testing.

Question 18

The product owner decides to launch a product after a couple of releases, knowing that the minimum viable product (MVP) lacks some features.

One of the key stakeholders, the marketing vice president, is not happy with the results and questioned the release decision.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Support the product owner's decision and seek better alignment with this stakeholder in order to avoid this type of issue in the future
  2. Coach the team on the decision-making process, assuming a risk-averse strategy towards product releasing
  3. Assume the responsibility for product releases, making the final call on when something is ready for customer launch
  4. Escalate the issue to the sponsor, questioning the authority of the key stakeholder regarding the product launch decision
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Support the product owner's decision and seek better alignment with this stakeholder in order to avoid this type of issue in the future

The project manager should support the product owner's decision since the product owner has the authority to make release decisions. The MVP approach is a valid business strategy, and the marketing VP's concerns, while valid, don't override the product owner's authority. The best approach is to work on better stakeholder alignment to prevent similar conflicts in future releases. Escalating to the sponsor or taking over release decisions would undermine the product owner's authority.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Coaching on decision-making assumes the product owner made an error, but MVP launches are legitimate business decisions.
  • C. The project manager should not assume responsibility for product release decisions, this is the product owner's domain.
  • D. Escalating to the sponsor to question the stakeholder's authority is inappropriate and bypasses proper governance structures.

Question 19

A project manager presented the project schedule to the mam stakeholders. They have requested that the project be completed two months earlier than the scheduled date.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Hold a stakeholder meeting to align timelines and scope expectations
  2. Crash the schedule to shorten the timeline while keeping the scope unchanged
  3. Update the cost management plan to allocate more resources to the project to finish the scope earlier
  4. Reduce the scope of the project by removing activities and shortening the timeline
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Hold a stakeholder meeting to align timelines and scope expectations

Before making any changes to the schedule, the project manager must first understand stakeholder expectations and align them with project constraints. A stakeholder meeting allows the team to discuss scope, resources, timeline realities, and trade-offs collaboratively, which is the prerequisite for any informed schedule adjustment decision.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Crashing the schedule without stakeholder alignment may be impossible or counterproductive if scope cannot realistically be maintained.
  • C. The cost management plan is not the primary tool for addressing timeline compression; this conflates cost and schedule management.
  • D. Reducing scope unilaterally without stakeholder discussion violates proper project governance and may not address the actual deadline concern.

Question 20

An agile project for a database migration impacts nearly all business units of the corporation. Every effort has been made to complete the migration before the end-of-support date for the database platform. A new impediment now implies the need to continue use of the old platform another year at a higher support price.

What should the product owner do about this situation?

  1. Reprioritize the backlog based on value and cost of delay divided by duration.
  2. Switch to a predictive approach to prevent any further delays to completion.
  3. Reprioritize the backlog based on story size and competence availability.
  4. Remove low-value items from the backlog to compensate for the higher cost.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Reprioritize the backlog based on value and cost of delay divided by duration.

When facing cost of delay due to platform support continuation, the product owner should apply weighted shortest job first (WSJF) prioritization by considering value and cost of delay divided by duration. This approach optimizes the backlog to deliver maximum business value while minimizing the financial impact of the delay. Option A directly addresses the financial impact (higher support costs) by prioritizing based on cost of delay metrics, which is the most appropriate agile response to this business constraint.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Switching to predictive/waterfall approaches contradicts agile principles and doesn't address the existing impediment or cost of delay.
  • C. Prioritizing by story size and resource availability ignores the critical business factor of cost of delay from extended support costs.
  • D. Simply removing items doesn't optimize for cost of delay and may eliminate valuable work that could mitigate the financial impact.

Question 21

A project manager is managing a national rollout for an innovative product in a regulated environment that is expected to change. The project management office (PMO) needs visibility of the regulatory constraints while maintaining a degree of flexibility.

Which tool can the project manager use?

  1. Use a burndown chart to provide transparency
  2. Use a burnup chart to provide transparency
  3. Use a kanban board to increase accountability
  4. Use a product backlog to manage changes
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Use a product backlog to manage changes

The product backlog is the ideal tool for managing regulatory constraints while maintaining flexibility. It allows the PMO to see all regulatory requirements documented and prioritized, providing necessary visibility. Simultaneously, it accommodates changes as the regulatory environment evolves by allowing backlog items to be reprioritized, modified, or added without disrupting the overall project structure. This balances control with adaptability.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Burndown charts show progress toward a fixed sprint or release goal but don't manage regulatory constraints or accommodate changing requirements.
  • B. Burnup charts display completed work against scope but don't provide a mechanism for managing constraints or handling scope changes.
  • C. Kanban boards increase work visibility and accountability but are not specifically designed to manage regulatory constraints or communicate changing requirements to PMO leadership.

Question 22

An unforeseen event has shut down public works projects for 4 weeks. Activities on the critical path will fall behind based on the project schedule.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Add 4 additional weeks to the schedule and request additional resources.
  2. Ask the sponsor to obtain a special work permit to continue work.
  3. Crash the resource management plan to keep the schedule on track.
  4. Review the project management plan to see the impact of the possible delay.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Review the project management plan to see the impact of the possible delay.

When an unforeseen event impacts the critical path, the project manager's first responsibility is to understand the full scope of consequences. Reviewing the project management plan allows the PM to analyze how the 4-week delay affects the overall schedule, budget, resources, risks, and other project constraints before taking corrective action. This analytical step must precede any decisions about crashing, adding resources, or requesting permits.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Adding time and resources without first analyzing impact is premature and may be unnecessary or insufficient.
  • B. Obtaining a work permit addresses only one potential barrier and assumes that is the actual constraint preventing work.
  • C. Crashing the resource plan is a corrective action that should only be implemented after understanding the true impact of the delay.

Question 23

A senior project manager has included a junior project manager as part of the project team. During a coaching session, the junior project manager asks the senior project manager how to be efficient and reduce rework.

How should the senior project manager respond?

  1. Use a work breakdown structure (WBS) to create a project schedule based on the project and resource requirements.
  2. Monitor resource allocation to ensure that team members work 8 hours per day.
  3. Assign project tasks to the team regardless of their skills to accomplish the project schedule.
  4. Schedule daily meetings with key stakeholders to assess the effectiveness of the project management plan.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Use a work breakdown structure (WBS) to create a project schedule based on the project and resource requirements.

Using a work breakdown structure (WBS) to create a comprehensive project schedule based on actual project and resource requirements is the foundation for reducing rework and improving efficiency. A well-constructed WBS ensures all work is identified, properly sequenced, and resources are appropriately allocated, which prevents gaps, duplication, and rework, the root causes of inefficiency.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Monitoring that team members work exactly 8 hours per day measures presence, not efficiency; it doesn't prevent rework or improve productivity.
  • C. Assigning tasks without regard to skills directly causes rework, quality issues, and inefficiency, the opposite of the goal.
  • D. Daily stakeholder meetings assess effectiveness after the fact but don't prevent rework; they're a reactive measure rather than a proactive planning approach.

Question 24

A project is about to start. The project manager has found that the client does not have an appropriate knowledge management system and does not have a requirement for it.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Provide just-in-time knowledge to the client, upon request.
  2. Utilize the cloud wiki to collect the necessary knowledge.
  3. Ask the team to collect the knowledge locally and share it at the end of the project.
  4. Coordinate with the team and the project stakeholders to collect the knowledge.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Coordinate with the team and the project stakeholders to collect the knowledge.

Even though the client does not currently have a knowledge management system or requirement, the project manager should coordinate with the team and stakeholders to establish a knowledge collection plan. This proactive approach ensures organizational learning, supports future projects, and demonstrates good governance. The absence of a stated requirement does not eliminate the responsibility to capture and preserve project knowledge.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Just-in-time knowledge delivery upon request leaves no lasting organizational record and fails to build institutional knowledge.
  • B. Utilizing a cloud wiki is a tool recommendation rather than addressing the broader coordination needed to identify what knowledge matters.
  • C. Collecting knowledge only locally and sharing at project end is too late and reactive; it should occur throughout the project with proper stakeholder involvement.

Question 25

The change control board (CCB) has approved a change request to add a new component within a product. The operations manager discovers the change after its approval and complains that the implementation of the change will cause significant disruption to the production line.

What should the project manager do first?

  1. Formally acknowledge the operation manager's concerns and raise a new risk that the project may deliver late and over budget due to manufacturing difficulties.
  2. Escalate the issue to the project sponsor, as the decision to add the component brings many benefits even though it will be disruptive to the production line.
  3. Lead a root cause analysis workshop with the design team to identify the failures that led to the decision to add a component that was not compatible with the production line.
  4. Meet with the operations manager to explain the background for the change and understand the operation manager's concerns about the change.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Meet with the operations manager to explain the background for the change and understand the operation manager's concerns about the change.

When an overlooked stakeholder raises legitimate concerns about an approved change, the project manager should first meet with them directly to understand their concerns and explain the change's background. This establishes communication, builds understanding, and gathers critical information about production impacts before taking further action. Only after understanding the full scope of the operations manager's concerns can appropriate next steps be determined.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Formally acknowledging concerns without first understanding them, then raising a generic risk, skips the critical fact-finding discussion.
  • B. Escalating immediately bypasses the opportunity to directly communicate with and understand the operations manager's specific concerns.
  • C. Root cause analysis is premature when the operations manager's actual concerns and constraints haven't yet been explored or understood.

25 questions in. Want the rest? The first half of the pack, free by email · The full pack

Question 26

A project manager is managing a project to deploy new software to 200 end users. During the implementation, there is a missed process that caused some of the users to lose their computer data.

What should the project manager do first?

  1. Meet with the team to discuss the root cause and encourage the team to take note of it and continue to focus on the deployment.
  2. Record this case until the final lessons learned session is complete to prevent impacting the team's morale during implementation.
  3. Meet with the team members and request they conduct a review of the case by providing feedback as lessons learned.
  4. Invite a consultant to review the process in order not to repeat the same issue and share the results with the team.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Meet with the team to discuss the root cause and encourage the team to take note of it and continue to focus on the deployment.

When a critical incident occurs during implementation that impacts end users, the immediate priority is to address the problem and maintain team focus on resolution. Meeting with the team to discuss root cause and encouraging them to document lessons while continuing the deployment demonstrates servant leadership and pragmatic crisis management. The team needs to understand what happened and stay focused rather than being delayed or demoralizing discussion.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Delaying discussion until final lessons learned ignores the immediate need to understand the problem and prevent recurrence during ongoing deployment.
  • C. Requesting lessons learned feedback in the midst of an active incident response is premature and diverts focus from immediate problem-solving.
  • D. Bringing in an external consultant adds delay and sends a message of distrust in the team's ability to address the issue themselves.

Question 27

A hybrid project has three vendor contracts to sign during the next quarter. The organization announces that all purchasing will move to a central procurement team next month, adding a new approval step. The team worries that vendor onboarding will slow down. What should the project manager do?

  1. Sign all three contracts this month so that they avoid the new central approval step.
  2. Ask the central procurement team to exempt the project from the new process.
  3. Keep the original procurement schedule unchanged and deal with any delays as they occur.
  4. Evaluate the change's impact with central procurement and update the schedule and risks.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Evaluate the change's impact with central procurement and update the schedule and risks.

The move to central procurement is an organizational change that directly affects the project. The project manager should evaluate its impact, such as new lead times and approval requirements, by working with the central procurement team, and then determine the actions needed, such as adjusting the procurement schedule, updating the risk register, and preparing submissions earlier. This supports the organization's change instead of working around it.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Rushing contracts to dodge the new control undermines the organizational change and may skip needed due diligence.
  • B. Seeking an exemption before analyzing the impact works against a change the organization has already decided on.
  • C. Ignoring a known change in lead times leaves the schedule exposed to avoidable delays.

Question 28

During project execution, the project manager discovered that a key deliverable was missing from the scope of work. After investigation, the project manager and the team discovered that the missing deliverable will impact the critical path.

What should the project manager do to avoid future delays?

  1. Submit a change request.
  2. Add additional resources to the project
  3. Update the scope of work
  4. Review the risk management plan
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Submit a change request.

When a key deliverable is discovered missing from the scope and impacts the critical path, the project manager should submit a change request (A). This is the formal mechanism to update scope, trigger impact analysis, and obtain stakeholder approval for adding the missing deliverable and addressing schedule impacts. While updating the scope statement (C) will ultimately occur, it must follow from an approved change request. Adding resources (B) addresses symptoms but not the root scope issue. Reviewing the risk management plan (D) doesn't resolve the scope gap.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Adding resources treats the symptom but doesn't follow proper scope change procedures.
  • C. The scope statement must be updated, but only after a change request is formally submitted and approved.
  • D. Reviewing the risk plan doesn't address the missing deliverable or authorize the scope change needed.

Question 29

An agile coach and technical writer for a globally distributed agile team are in a country with a 9-hour time zone difference from the agile team.

The agile coach and project lead disagree on the timing for the daily standup. The project lead thinks the standup should be at 10:00 am local time, but the agile coach and technical writer feel that is an inconvenient time for them.

How does the project lead ensure adherence to agile practices?

  1. Inform the agile coach that the daily standup will be at 10:00 am local time and ensure all parties can attend
  2. Escalate to management that the agile process is not going to work and ask them to speak to the agile coach
  3. Have a discussion with the team on the approach and come to a decision on when the daily standups should be
  4. Have two separate daily standups, one for the agile coach and technical writer and one for the agile development team
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Have a discussion with the team on the approach and come to a decision on when the daily standups should be

In agile practice, decisions about ceremonies like standups should be made collaboratively with the team. The project lead should have a discussion with all stakeholders, the agile coach, technical writer, and development team, to reach a mutually acceptable time that balances everyone's constraints. This honors agile values of collaboration and respects the challenges of distributed teams while maintaining the practice.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Unilaterally imposing a time that is inconvenient for team members violates agile collaboration principles and may cause disengagement.
  • B. Escalating to management instead of facilitating team problem-solving contradicts agile and servant-leadership approaches.
  • D. Creating two separate standups defeats the purpose of a unified daily standup and fragments the team's communication.

Question 30

When a project is in its final stage, the project manager will request from the team to prepare a delivery acceptance document.

What is the importance of this document to the project manager?

  1. Needed to close the work breakdown structure (WBS).
  2. Needed to share it with the stakeholders.
  3. Needed to close out the project or a phase.
  4. Needed to release the team at the end of the project.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Needed to close out the project or a phase.

A delivery acceptance document is essential for formal project or phase closure. It confirms that deliverables meet acceptance criteria, establishes stakeholder sign-off, and provides the basis for transitioning from execution to closure activities. This document is a key input to the Close Project or Phase process, enabling proper administrative and financial closure. Without formal acceptance documentation, the project cannot be officially closed.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. The WBS is a planning artifact closed through project governance; acceptance documents don't directly close the WBS.
  • B. While stakeholders may review acceptance documents, sharing with stakeholders is a communication output, not the primary purpose of the document.
  • D. Team release is a separate administrative action; the acceptance document's primary purpose is project/phase closure, not resource management.

Question 31

A multiyear resource constraint project is midway through the execution phase. During a progress update meeting, it has been determined that there might be a schedule delay to deliver the project. The project manager has observed that all of the team members are working hard and lots of deliverables have already been completed.

What should the project manager do immediately about this situation?

  1. Register the schedule risk and present the new resources requirement to the change management board for schedule recovery.
  2. Prepare a monthly report by highlighting the completed deliverables and communicate the delay to management.
  3. Ask the project planner to identify the critical path and respective delayed activities, and then investigate the reasons for the delay.
  4. Ask the scheduler to update the schedule with the percent of work in progress (WIP) and communicate the results to the team.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Ask the project planner to identify the critical path and respective delayed activities, and then investigate the reasons for the delay.

When a schedule delay is identified despite visible progress and hard work, the immediate action is to investigate root causes systematically. The project manager should direct the project planner to analyze the critical path and identify which specific activities are delayed and why. This diagnostic step is essential before taking corrective action, as visible deliverables and effort do not guarantee schedule adherence, delays may result from dependencies, critical path issues, or resource allocation problems that must be understood first.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Registering risk and requesting resources is premature without first understanding why the delay occurred; resources may not be the root cause.
  • B. Preparing a report highlighting completed work while communicating delay to management is passive and doesn't address root causes or enable corrective action.
  • D. Updating the schedule with work-in-progress percentages is a tracking activity, not an investigative step to identify why delays are occurring.

Question 32

A project manager has just identified 45 stakeholders for a predictive hospital records project. The stakeholder register lists only their names and job titles, and the project manager has limited time to spend aligning their expectations. What should the project manager do NEXT?

  1. Send the same detailed weekly status report to all 45 stakeholders so every one of them stays fully informed.
  2. Schedule a one-hour individual meeting with each stakeholder before writing any engagement plan.
  3. Group the stakeholders by their level of influence and interest to decide how closely to engage each one.
  4. Ask the sponsor to name the five stakeholders who matter most and stop engaging the others.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Group the stakeholders by their level of influence and interest to decide how closely to engage each one.

With many stakeholders and limited time, the project manager first categorizes them, for example by their influence over the project and their interest in its outcome. The categories show who needs close involvement to align expectations, who should be kept satisfied, and who only needs to be kept informed. This focuses discussion where misaligned expectations would do the most harm, and it gives the engagement approach a sound basis instead of treating all 45 people the same way.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. One identical detailed report treats every stakeholder the same and does nothing to find whose expectations need active alignment.
  • B. Hour-long meetings with all 45 people before setting any priorities use the limited time poorly.
  • D. Dropping all but five stakeholders ignores people whose influence or interest may still affect the project.

Question 33

A company is initiating a project to enhance one of its existing products. All of its products are developed internally.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Ensure the stakeholder engagement plan is accurate and properly documented
  2. Review the lessons learned from the previous project
  3. Identify the risk of implementing the new solution and evaluate the impact on the project
  4. Create a lessons learned document for the initiation phase
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Review the lessons learned from the previous project

When initiating a project to enhance an existing product, reviewing lessons learned from the previous project is the most critical action. This provides valuable insights into what worked, what didn't, risks encountered, and recommendations that directly inform the current project's planning and execution. Lessons learned capture organizational knowledge that prevents repeating past mistakes and accelerates project success.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While stakeholder engagement planning is important, it is typically refined during planning, not the primary initiation focus.
  • C. Risk identification occurs primarily during planning; at initiation, reviewing past experience is more foundational.
  • D. Creating lessons learned is an output of project closure, not initiation; reviewing them from past projects is the priority.

Question 34

A project is in the knowledge transfer phase, and a few subject matter experts (SMEs) went to the client site for knowledge transfer. The SMEs captured various process deviations without sharing with the project team.

How can the project manager ensure knowledge transfer across the team?

  1. Ask the project team to run a deviation log review meeting with the client, highlighting that the project may not be able to go live as scheduled.
  2. Ask the project team to facilitate a lessons learned session during the project closure phase to incorporate this issue.
  3. Ask the project management office (PMO) to provide team members with real-time visibility for deviations and facilitate team members to resolve issues.
  4. Ask the SMEs to share the knowledge transfer documents with all other members by placing the documents in the project management information system (PMIS).
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Ask the SMEs to share the knowledge transfer documents with all other members by placing the documents in the project management information system (PMIS).

The project manager should ask the SMEs to share the knowledge transfer documents with all team members by placing them in the PMIS. This ensures real-time visibility and centralized access to all captured information, including process deviations, allowing the entire team to be informed and enabling collaborative problem-solving. A PMIS provides a single source of truth for project documentation.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Threatening schedule impact during a deviation log meeting is confrontational and doesn't facilitate knowledge transfer.
  • B. Waiting until lessons learned at project closure delays addressing critical deviations that may affect go-live readiness.
  • C. While the PMO can help, the immediate solution is to ensure documents are accessible to the team through the PMIS.

Question 35

A project manager has been assigned a project to build a new solar farm that will provide clean energy to a new housing complex. The government has decided to reduce the tax on renewable energy products starting 1 January. The supplier has reached out and stated that the order placed for solar panels to be delivered on 20 December might be delayed until early January. On the other hand, the project will face similar constraints due to the December holidays.

What should the project manager do about this risk?

  1. Review the supplier's contract to understand the terms of sale
  2. Insist that the supplier deliver the goods on the agreed date
  3. Update the risk register and take advantage of the opportunity
  4. Accept the risk and update the risk register
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Update the risk register and take advantage of the opportunity

This situation presents both a risk (delayed delivery) and an opportunity (tax reduction on January 1). The correct response is to recognize and document this in the risk register while actively managing it. The potential January delivery aligns with the tax incentive, which could provide cost savings and benefits to the project. The PM should develop a response strategy that leverages this positive occurrence rather than simply accepting it passively, demonstrating proactive opportunity management.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While reviewing the contract is prudent, it doesn't constitute the primary risk management action needed here.
  • B. Insisting on December delivery ignores the potential benefit of the January tax reduction and the legitimate constraint of holiday schedules.
  • D. Simply accepting and registering the risk treats this as a threat only and fails to recognize and capitalize on the opportunity aspect.

Question 36

A company is implementing a growth strategy by constructing a new production facility, which will soon move into the operation phase. Although a governance policy was already in place, the company must comply with new financial regulations that have been recently implemented.

Compliance with the regulations will cause a major change in project scope.

How should the project manager respond to this requirement?

  1. Perform an analysis to assess the Impact on the project.
  2. Proceed with the existing company governance policy.
  3. Escalate the issue to upper management and let them decide.
  4. Directly comply with the financial regulations.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Perform an analysis to assess the Impact on the project.

When new regulatory requirements create scope changes, the project manager must first analyze the impact on schedule, budget, resources, and other project constraints. This systematic assessment provides the data needed to determine the best course of action and to communicate clearly with stakeholders about implications.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Proceeding with existing governance ignores the legal requirement to comply with new financial regulations.
  • C. Immediate escalation without analysis is premature and deprives leadership of the information needed to make an informed decision.
  • D. Direct compliance without assessment may lead to unplanned scope creep, budget overruns, or schedule delays that could have been anticipated.

Question 37

A healthcare organization hired a new compliance specialist to ensure that the healthcare compliance needs are met. The feedback about the new compliance specialist from the team was average.

What should the project manager do to help the new compliance specialist improve?

  1. Coordinate a one-to-one meeting with the specialist to assess the situation
  2. Escalate this situation to the manager of the area for a possible solution
  3. Provide time for the specialist to adjust to the pace of the project
  4. Contact the human resources (HR) manager about the team's feedback
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Coordinate a one-to-one meeting with the specialist to assess the situation

Before escalating or making assumptions about the new compliance specialist's performance, the project manager should conduct a direct, one-to-one meeting to assess the underlying situation. This allows the PM to understand specific challenges, gather factual feedback, identify skill gaps, and work collaboratively with the specialist on improvement. This approach demonstrates support and addresses issues at the source before involving HR or functional managers.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Escalating immediately bypasses the opportunity for direct dialogue and support, and may damage the specialist's morale and professional standing unnecessarily.
  • C. Simply providing adjustment time without assessment or intervention does not actively help the specialist improve or address team concerns.
  • D. Contacting HR about feedback should only occur after direct attempts to support and coach the specialist, and if performance issues persist.

Question 38

A project manager is using a subcontractor for mobile application development.

When the project team tests the application, they realize it does not comply with the new company user-interface standards. Even though these new standards were not included in the statement of work (SOW), the subcontractor agrees to the additional scope as long as payment for this additional work is paid immediately.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Negotiate new pricing based on the revised estimations from the subcontractor that reflect the new work.
  2. Initiate a change request and review the contract to evaluate the payment options before responding.
  3. Deny the subcontractor's payment request, because the product does not comply with the project needs and close the project.
  4. Initiate a change to incorporate an immediate payment milestone in the contract as per the subcontractor's request.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Initiate a change request and review the contract to evaluate the payment options before responding.

The project manager should initiate a formal change request to document the scope addition (new UI standards) and simultaneously review the contract to understand payment terms, change order procedures, and what options exist before committing to immediate payment. This ensures proper change control and contract compliance while evaluating financial implications.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Negotiating new pricing alone bypasses the formal change control process and contract review required to properly handle scope additions.
  • C. Denying payment while demanding compliance ignores that additional work genuinely occurred and deserves fair compensation; it also damages the subcontractor relationship.
  • D. Immediately modifying the contract to include an immediate payment milestone skips the evaluation step and may violate company financial controls or contract procedures.

Question 39

In an agile team, some of the team members are coming forward to ask for more autonomy on the project.

What should the project manager do in this situation?

  1. Encourage the team lead to make decisions.
  2. Encourage the team members to make decisions.
  3. Discourage them as conflicts may be created.
  4. Discourage this request, as it is for the management team.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Encourage the team members to make decisions.

In agile, team members should be empowered to make decisions within their scope of work. A servant leader encourages and enables team autonomy rather than maintaining control, as this drives accountability, motivation, and faster decision-making. The project manager's role is to remove obstacles and enable the team to self-organize, not to restrict their decision-making authority.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Delegating to the team lead instead of the requesting team members maintains hierarchy and reduces the autonomy they're requesting.
  • C. Discouraging autonomy contradicts agile principles and servant leadership, and prevents team growth and empowerment.
  • D. Discouraging this request and reserving decisions for management contradicts agile and servant leadership principles.

Question 40

A project is in the execution phase. The client was actively involved in the early stages but has been less engaged lately. A number of changes to the requirements have recently been requested.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Discuss the changes with the client and jointly make the decision on how to proceed.
  2. Reject the changes and stay the original course as initially agreed with the client.
  3. Review the risk register to see if mitigations have already been outlined for this scenario.
  4. Review the changes and make the decision based on the project team's recommendations.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Discuss the changes with the client and jointly make the decision on how to proceed.

When a client requests changes, the project manager should engage the client directly in a collaborative discussion to jointly determine how to proceed. This respects the client's authority as a key stakeholder, maintains the relationship, and ensures decisions are made transparently rather than unilaterally. The decreasing engagement makes this discussion even more critical to re-establish alignment and understanding.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Outright rejection of client requests ignores legitimate needs and damages stakeholder relationships.
  • C. While risk review is part of change management, it should not replace direct client engagement on their own requests.
  • D. Making decisions based only on the project team's recommendations excludes the client from determining their own requirements.

Question 41

A team member who is working on a critical project deliverable reported that their computer is not working. The IT department says that due to a high workload, they will not be able to provide assistance for 1 week.

How should the project manager address this situation?

  1. Use project reserves to buy new equipment to avoid an impact to the critical path of the project
  2. Schedule a meeting with the project sponsor to request a budget to buy or rent a new computer
  3. Explore options with the IT department to expedite the necessary repairs based on criticality of the project
  4. Ask the team member to find an innovative solution or workaround to overcome the issue and avoid project delays
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Explore options with the IT department to expedite the necessary repairs based on criticality of the project

The project manager should first escalate within existing channels by working with IT to expedite resolution based on project criticality. This is the most direct and efficient approach, leveraging existing relationships and resources. Escalation based on business impact is standard practice and more appropriate than immediately using reserves (A), seeking budget approval (B), or placing burden on the team member (D).

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Using reserves should be a last resort, not the first response when escalation may resolve the issue.
  • B. Requesting budget approval is unnecessarily bureaucratic when expedited IT support based on criticality may be available.
  • D. Asking the team member to find a workaround shifts responsibility and is inappropriate for a critical path item requiring proper equipment.

Question 42

While finalizing project management plans, a customer provides the project manager with a new set of quality standards to which the final product must adhere.

What should the project manager do to ensure a smooth delivery of the product?

  1. Involve the client in risk identification
  2. Agree with the client on a new project charter
  3. Involve the client in a performance gap analysis
  4. Agree with the client on acceptance criteria
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Agree with the client on acceptance criteria

When new quality standards are provided mid-project, the project manager must agree with the client on updated acceptance criteria that reflect these new standards. This ensures clear expectations and defines what constitutes successful delivery. Acceptance criteria provide objective measures for determining whether the product meets the new quality requirements before final delivery.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Risk identification is important but does not directly address the need to establish what the client expects to receive.
  • B. Creating a new project charter is excessive; acceptance criteria adjustment is the appropriate response.
  • C. Performance gap analysis is analytical but does not establish the clear acceptance standards needed for delivery.

Question 43

A project manager is assigned to work on a complex and innovative project. The technology being used and developed is new and complicated, and most of the stakeholders are unfamiliar with it.

Which approach should the project manager use as a servant leader?

  1. Escalate the issue with upper management to find a novel solution for this situation.
  2. Contact the project sponsor to get those stakeholders removed from the project.
  3. Allocate resources to provide training about the new technology to the stakeholders.
  4. Ask stakeholders to find and self-fund education about this new technology.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Allocate resources to provide training about the new technology to the stakeholders.

A servant leader removes barriers and empowers stakeholders by providing the resources they need to succeed. Allocating resources for training demonstrates commitment to stakeholder success and addresses the root cause of their unfamiliarity with the technology. This approach builds capability within the team and enables informed participation in the project.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Escalating avoids the problem and doesn't serve the stakeholders or project by removing the learning barrier.
  • B. Removing stakeholders is counterproductive and doesn't solve the underlying knowledge gap; it abandons them rather than serving them.
  • D. Asking stakeholders to self-fund education shifts responsibility away from the project and organization, failing to serve their development needs.

Question 44

During a regular project progress meeting, the CEO informed the project manager that a major stakeholder has been unaware of recent developments on the project. The project manager is sure that the stakeholder was duly identified and classified in the stakeholder register.

Which project document should the project manager review in order to determine the reason for this issue?

  1. Requirements traceability matrix
  2. Issue log
  3. Stakeholder register
  4. Stakeholder engagement assessment matrix
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Stakeholder engagement assessment matrix

The stakeholder register identifies and classifies stakeholders, but the stakeholder engagement assessment matrix specifically documents the current and desired engagement levels for each stakeholder. This document reveals whether the identified stakeholder's actual engagement matches the planned engagement strategy, explaining why a classified stakeholder may have missed important developments despite being in the register. It tracks engagement performance, not just identification.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. The requirements traceability matrix links requirements to project elements; it does not address stakeholder engagement or communication status.
  • B. The issue log documents problems and their resolution; it would not systematically show stakeholder communication gaps.
  • C. The stakeholder register identifies who stakeholders are and their classification, but does not document engagement effectiveness or communication performance.

Question 45

Knowledge sharing has been a key priority for a complex technological project with a large number of team members. During the project execution phase, the project manager receives numerous complaints from all team members that they are overloaded with knowledge-sharing emails, which contain useful information but are unmanageable due to the high volume.

What should the project manager do to solve this problem?

  1. Establish an unofficial communications method for the team to share knowledge and lessons learned.
  2. Establish a pull communications method to access knowledge repositories and lessons learned.
  3. Establish an interactive communications method between stakeholders to share knowledge and lessons learned.
  4. Establish a push communications method for the team to share knowledge and lessons learned.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Establish a pull communications method to access knowledge repositories and lessons learned.

The problem is information overload from push communications (everyone receiving emails). A pull communications method allows team members to access knowledge repositories and lessons learned on-demand, reducing inbox burden while preserving information availability. This gives control to the user. Unofficial methods (A) lose organizational oversight; interactive sessions (C) may increase, not decrease, communication volume; push methods (D) perpetuate the overload problem.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Unofficial channels undermine organizational knowledge management and create silos.
  • C. Interactive stakeholder sessions could increase communication burden rather than reduce it.
  • D. Push communications cause the current problem; continuing this method won't solve the overload.

Question 46

After a couple of iterations, the project manager decides to present the product to a key stakeholder. The stakeholder's feedback is that the team missed the mark on many features.

What should the project manager do to avoid this in the future?

  1. Set up requirements-gathering sessions with all key stakeholders to evaluate the scope once again and reprioritize the backlog based on the sessions
  2. Schedule adequate sprint demos to gather early feedback from the stakeholders and adapt the plan accordingly
  3. Incorporate design thinking practices into the project life cycle to better understand the product's personas and be more effective to match their needs
  4. Evaluate the team's skills to look for someone with experience in product design and assign that person the task of rebuilding the product interface
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Schedule adequate sprint demos to gather early feedback from the stakeholders and adapt the plan accordingly

To prevent misalignment on features in future iterations, the project manager should schedule regular sprint demos with stakeholders to gather early and continuous feedback. This approach enables the team to adapt the plan and backlog prioritization based on actual stakeholder input throughout development rather than discovering misalignment late in the project.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While requirements gathering is valuable, it's a one-time activity that doesn't provide the continuous feedback needed during iterative development.
  • C. Design thinking is a useful approach but is more about initial discovery than fixing the feedback mechanism already in place.
  • D. Personnel changes and product rebuilding are premature without first establishing better feedback channels.

Question 47

A project manager is leading a project that is in an advanced stage. All high-level risks identified in the risk management plan have been resolved or are no longer a risk for the project. Only low-level risks remain.

What should the project manager do now?

  1. Reclassify low-level risks as high-level risks.
  2. Notify stakeholders that all high-level risks have been resolved.
  3. Reduce the priority of project risks as all remaining risks are low-level.
  4. Reevaluate identified risks and update the risk register.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Reevaluate identified risks and update the risk register.

Risk management is an ongoing process throughout the project lifecycle. Even when high-level risks have been resolved, the project manager should continue to reevaluate all identified risks and update the risk register to reflect the current project status. New risks may emerge, previously low-level risks could escalate in priority, or assumptions may have changed. This ensures the risk register remains accurate and relevant.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Artificially reclassifying low-level risks as high-level risks misrepresents project status and wastes management attention on non-critical issues.
  • B. While notifying stakeholders of resolved high-level risks is appropriate, it does not address the need for continued risk management of remaining risks.
  • C. Simply reducing priority without reevaluation abandons active risk monitoring and could miss emerging issues.

Question 48

A solution designer in an agile team often passes the design information to team members without any documentation. This has resulted in misunderstandings within the team.

What should the agile leader do?

  1. Move the solution designer to another team
  2. Review the process that resulted in this situation
  3. Ask the team to document the design
  4. Stop work until the design document is completed
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Review the process that resulted in this situation

In agile, the leader should facilitate process improvement by examining the root causes of problems. The misunderstandings stem from a process issue (undocumented design handoffs), not from an individual being unsuitable. The agile leader should work with the team to understand why documentation isn't happening and collaboratively redesign the process to prevent future misunderstandings.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Removing the solution designer doesn't address the systemic process problem and removes valuable expertise.
  • C. Asking the team to document is telling them what to do without understanding why the process broke down; it misses root cause analysis.
  • D. Stopping work is excessive and punitive; it prevents progress without solving the underlying communication and documentation process issues.

Question 49

During a documentation audit of an international company, it was identified that the last version of the project schedule was from one month ago even though the project manager knew it was recently updated.

How should the project manager have handled documentation for the project?

  1. Updated the project management plan regularly and had it securely shared with all stakeholders
  2. Assigned a project team member to ensure all project documentation was updated
  3. Reviewed the risk register to identify a response plan for the audit
  4. Kept documentation in the project management information system (PMIS), and shared it with appropriate stakeholders
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Kept documentation in the project management information system (PMIS), and shared it with appropriate stakeholders

Keeping project documentation in a Project Management Information System (PMIS) and sharing it with appropriate stakeholders ensures that all versions are current, centralized, and accessible. A PMIS maintains version control and ensures that stakeholders have access to the latest updates, preventing the situation where an outdated schedule exists while recent updates are unknown to the organization.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While regular updates and secure sharing are important, option D specifically addresses the systemic solution of using a PMIS to prevent version control issues.
  • B. Assigning a team member to update documentation is less reliable than implementing a systematic PMIS-based approach.
  • C. Reviewing the risk register is reactive and does not address the root cause of poor documentation management practices.

Question 50

A client is structured as a matrix organization for an agile project. The project manager is working on-site with key stakeholders from different parts of the organization.

How should the project manager handle the different stakeholders?

  1. All stakeholders are important, so the project manager should follow directions provided by management and key stakeholders
  2. Because there are different perspectives, perform a stakeholder analysis and act based on the outcome
  3. The project manager is working on the client's premises, so follow the directions of all the key stakeholders
  4. This is an agile project, so listen only to the directions of the project manager's supervisor and the functional managers of the organization
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Because there are different perspectives, perform a stakeholder analysis and act based on the outcome

In a matrix organization with multiple stakeholders from different departments, a formal stakeholder analysis is essential to understand their interests, influence, and priorities. This analysis guides how the project manager should engage with and balance the different stakeholders' needs rather than simply following all directions equally. This is a structured approach to managing complex stakeholder landscapes.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Not all stakeholders are equally important; treating them equally without analysis can lead to misaligned priorities.
  • C. Being on-site does not mean following all stakeholders' directions; proper analysis is still necessary to prioritize and manage competing interests.
  • D. In agile projects with matrix organizations, listening only to the supervisor and functional managers ignores other critical stakeholders and misses key perspectives.

50 questions in. Want the rest? The first half of the pack, free by email · The full pack

Question 51

Two team members were recently released from a project because the customer reduced the budget. However, the agile team is still receiving the same, if not more, work requirements as before.

How should the agile project leader resolve this situation?

  1. Update the project budget with the released team members.
  2. Update the restriction log with the new team capacity.
  3. Explain the new project requirements to the team.
  4. Explain the new team velocity to the customer.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Explain the new team velocity to the customer.

When team capacity decreases but work requirements remain the same or increase, the project leader must communicate the new team velocity to the customer. This is essential because velocity directly determines what can be delivered in each sprint. The customer needs to understand the impact of the budget reduction on delivery capacity so they can make informed decisions about scope, timeline, or priorities. This addresses the root cause of the conflict by setting realistic expectations.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Updating the budget with released team members doesn't solve the mismatch between capacity and requirements.
  • B. A restriction log is not a standard agile artifact for managing this type of capacity issue.
  • C. Explaining requirements to the team doesn't solve the fundamental problem that they lack capacity to deliver them.

Question 52

On a project with multiple international locations, a trend for delays has been flagged.

When looking into the issue, the project manager realized that some of the key activities were scheduled over the holiday periods in the overseas offices.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Update the schedule to reflect the holidays and notify the project sponsor of the delayed completion.
  2. Hire additional personnel on a temporary basis to cover the extra workload during the holiday seasons.
  3. Request that the offices in overseas locations work overtime to mitigate schedule slippages.
  4. Update the schedule to reflect the holidays and share the workload among offices to mitigate schedule slippage.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Update the schedule to reflect the holidays and share the workload among offices to mitigate schedule slippage.

Updating the schedule to reflect holidays demonstrates proper planning, while sharing workload among offices mitigates schedule slippage without imposing unreasonable demands on any single location. This balanced approach respects cultural and operational realities of international offices while maintaining project timelines through intelligent resource distribution and planning.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Simply updating the schedule and notifying the sponsor does not mitigate the delays; it only reports them after the fact.
  • B. Hiring temporary personnel is costly and may not address the root cause (poor holiday planning) or develop sustainable solutions.
  • C. Requiring overseas offices to work overtime disrespects local practices, creates burnout risk, and is a poor management approach to a foreseeable scheduling issue.

Question 53

A new team member on a self-organizing team is finding it difficult to deliver due to the new technology being used in the project.

What should the project manager do in this situation?

  1. Delegate other team members to complete this team member's tasks.
  2. Mentor the team member and provide the necessary training.
  3. Request the team member to move to another team.
  4. Include the team member in an improvement program through a human resources (HR) request.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Mentor the team member and provide the necessary training.

The project manager should mentor the team member and provide necessary training to help them overcome the technology barrier. This is the most constructive approach that develops the team member's capabilities, supports their success, and retains a valuable resource. Mentoring aligns with both project team development practices and the concept of empowering team members to grow.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Delegating tasks away removes the opportunity for the team member to develop skills and doesn't solve the underlying competency gap.
  • C. Moving the team member to another team is a dismissive approach that wastes the investment in onboarding and doesn't address the training need.
  • D. An HR improvement program is typically used for performance issues, not skill development needs; direct mentoring and training are more appropriate and faster.

Question 54

During a sprint, one of the team members found an issue. According to the team member and the product owner, the issue has a higher level of importance than the other features of the sprint, but is not a roadblock to completing it.

What should the project lead ask the project team do?

  1. Avoid the temptation to make any changes and address the issue in the next sprint.
  2. Submit the issue to the change control board (CCB) to evaluate and formally approve a plan to address it.
  3. Address this issue only as it has a higher priority than the remaining features of the same sprint.
  4. Follow the sprint plan by delivering the features established for the sprint and prioritize the issue in the backlog.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Follow the sprint plan by delivering the features established for the sprint and prioritize the issue in the backlog.

In agile methodology, sprint scope should remain stable once committed. Although the issue has higher importance than other sprint features, if it is not a blocker to sprint completion, the team should deliver the committed features and add the issue to the product backlog for prioritization in future sprints. This preserves sprint integrity while ensuring the issue receives appropriate priority attention.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While addressing in the next sprint is correct, the answer overlooks the need to formally capture and prioritize the issue.
  • B. A CCB is a waterfall/change control concept; agile teams use the product backlog for issue prioritization rather than formal change boards.
  • C. Mid-sprint scope changes undermine sprint planning and team commitment, even for higher-priority issues that are not blockers.

Question 55

A project manager is leading an automation project. The project team is colocated and includes people from both the technical and business units. The project manager discovers that personal differences and work styles are affecting the project negatively.

How should the project manager address this?

  1. Develop a schedule that ensures people with personal differences work separately.
  2. Invite the functional managers of the different units to address their personal differences.
  3. Use an approach to the project that does not involve colocation.
  4. Meet with the team and agree on expectations from team members.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Meet with the team and agree on expectations from team members.

When personal differences and work style conflicts negatively affect project performance, the project manager should meet with the team to discuss and agree on expectations from team members. This establishes ground rules, clarifies acceptable behaviors, and builds a team agreement on how to work together professionally. This approach directly addresses the cultural and interpersonal issues without avoiding the situation or imposing separations.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Separating team members with personal differences prevents them from learning to work together and is a form of avoidance that doesn't resolve underlying issues.
  • B. Involving functional managers escalates the issue unnecessarily and removes the project manager's responsibility to lead the team effectively.
  • C. Changing from colocation to non-colocation avoids the problem rather than resolving it and may reduce collaboration effectiveness.

Question 56

A project manager has been selected to deliver one of an organization's key flagship solutions. Critical success factors include agility, market adaptation, and a quick response to market offerings.

What is one of the key activities that the project manager should undertake to ensure company success?

  1. Request more funding from the project sponsor to hire additional skilled resources and to incorporate additional quality in the project delivery approach and outcome.
  2. Review the project objectives with the project sponsor to agree on more realistic and achievable project plans and deliverables.
  3. Create a business case after performing a market review, and then submit it to the sponsor to modify the project deliverable to meet the newly defined objectives.
  4. Conduct periodical reviews of the project plans, objectives, and deliverables to ensure all relevant data are captured to continue making informed project decisions.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Conduct periodical reviews of the project plans, objectives, and deliverables to ensure all relevant data are captured to continue making informed project decisions.

For a flagship solution requiring agility, market adaptation, and quick response, the key activity is conducting periodic reviews of project plans, objectives, and deliverables to ensure informed decision-making as conditions change. This supports the dynamic nature of the project and enables rapid course correction. Option A (request more funding) assumes the problem is resource-based; option B (agree on realistic plans) may undermine competitive advantage by reducing scope; option C (create business case post-project-start) reverses proper sequencing and creates delays.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Requesting more funding assumes the solution is resource-based, but agility and market responsiveness require adaptive management, not just more resources.
  • B. Agreeing on more realistic and achievable plans may compromise the agility and market competitiveness that define success for a flagship solution.
  • C. Creating a business case after project initiation is backwards sequencing and delays decision-making when quick market response is a critical success factor.

Question 57

One of the main inputs required for a deliverable is missing due to a miscommunication between the vendor and project manager. Because of the missed deliverable, the critical path of the project is extended.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Start an audit of the vendor's processes and procedures
  2. Review lessons learned from previous projects with this vendor
  3. Make a detailed analysis on vendor issues during the project
  4. Execute a contingency plan to address the issue with the vendor
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Execute a contingency plan to address the issue with the vendor

When a critical path is extended due to a missed deliverable, the project manager should execute the contingency plan that was developed during planning to address schedule impacts. A contingency plan is a predetermined response to known risks and is the appropriate tool to use when an anticipated problem materializes.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Starting an audit is a lengthy process inappropriate when immediate action is needed to recover the critical path.
  • B. Reviewing lessons learned from past vendor projects is retrospective and does not address the immediate schedule impact.
  • C. Making a detailed analysis of vendor issues is important for future relationships but does not address the current schedule emergency.

Question 58

A project manager is assigned to a project within a program. The high-level requirements of the project are known, but the priorities of some of the requirements are uncertain as they are interdependent on some other pipeline projects within the program.

How should the project manager prepare for the next steps of the project?

  1. Escalate to the management team to increase the timeline based on the complexity of the project
  2. Wait for the other project estimates before planning the schedule
  3. Prioritize and estimate the milestones for the high-level requirements based on historical data
  4. Ask the project management office (PMO) to estimate the tasks for all the projects and share the project management plan
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Prioritize and estimate the milestones for the high-level requirements based on historical data

When requirement priorities are uncertain due to dependencies on other pipeline projects, the project manager should proceed pragmatically by prioritizing and estimating milestones based on the high-level requirements they do know, using historical data as a reference. This allows the project to move forward productively while dependencies are being clarified, rather than waiting or escalating prematurely.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Escalating to increase the timeline is premature when the problem is about uncertain priorities, not necessarily timeline insufficiency.
  • B. Waiting for other project estimates creates unnecessary delays and prevents the project from progressing on known requirements.
  • D. Asking the PMO to estimate all tasks across all projects exceeds the scope of a single project manager's responsibility and is inefficient.

Question 59

A team has been working on a project for several months, but the completion date is unclear because the scope is changing frequently as new knowledge is gained. Some deliverables have already been completed, but when new stakeholders join the team, they complain that project outcomes are not meeting business goals.

How can the project manager prevent this situation from happening in the future?

  1. Create a prioritized backlog and define iteration review sessions with stakeholders
  2. Create a detailed work breakdown structure (WBS) and milestone schedule approved by all stakeholders
  3. Schedule a daily meeting to review team performance and impediments
  4. Schedule a kick-off meeting for every project phase to share the project management plan with all stakeholders
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Create a prioritized backlog and define iteration review sessions with stakeholders

A prioritized backlog with regular iteration review sessions keeps stakeholders engaged, aligned on business goals, and able to provide feedback early and often. This prevents the disconnect where new stakeholders later complain that outcomes don't meet business goals because they weren't involved in refinement and review cycles. This is foundational agile practice for managing evolving scope while maintaining stakeholder satisfaction.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. A detailed WBS and fixed milestone schedule are predictive approaches that don't accommodate the frequent scope changes described; they also don't ensure ongoing stakeholder alignment.
  • C. Daily performance reviews are internal team activities that don't address external stakeholder engagement or expectation management.
  • D. Phase kick-offs are event-driven and don't provide the continuous stakeholder engagement needed to prevent misalignment as scope evolves.

Question 60

A project manager is approaching the end of a project, and several tasks are now practically complete and ready for handover to the client.

How should the project manager proceed?

  1. Update the quality management plan for the overall project
  2. Ask the client to verify and accept the tasks that have been completed
  3. Close out the project tasks that have been completed
  4. Update the communications management plan for the overall project
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Ask the client to verify and accept the tasks that have been completed

Before tasks are considered complete and ready for handover, the client must verify and formally accept the completed work. This client acceptance and sign-off is a critical step in the handover process that ensures the deliverables meet requirements and expectations before closing out tasks.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Updating the quality management plan is not the immediate next step when deliverables are ready for handover.
  • C. Closing out tasks should occur after client verification and acceptance, not before.
  • D. Updating the communications management plan is not the priority when deliverables are ready for handover to the client.

Question 61

A company just started managing a project using an agile approach. Due to this change, the general manager is worried about the scope definition process for upcoming projects.

What should the project manager do to ensure the project scope is completely defined?

  1. Meet with the general manager and convince them to return to using predictive approaches to avoid any risk
  2. Ask the general manager to review every requirement to ensure all projects will deliver the requested products
  3. Ask for a budget increase to implement a double-check process to ensure every business need is included in the requirements
  4. Help sponsors and stakeholders craft the product vision, and bring the team and product owner together to clarify expectations
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Help sponsors and stakeholders craft the product vision, and bring the team and product owner together to clarify expectations

In agile projects, scope is defined iteratively through collaboration between the product owner, team, and stakeholders. The project manager should help craft the product vision and bring everyone together to clarify expectations. This collaborative approach ensures that scope is continuously refined and understood, even though it is not defined upfront as in predictive approaches.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Reverting to predictive approaches dismisses the agile methodology and does not address the general manager's concerns about the new approach.
  • B. Having the general manager review every requirement creates a bottleneck and is not how agile teams define scope collaboratively.
  • C. Requesting a budget increase for double-checking is unnecessary; agile relies on iterative refinement and team collaboration, not duplicate verification.

Question 62

At the end of a project with multiple suppliers, the project manager is reviewing the closing process and finds that an unexpected financial balance is remaining.

What will help the project manager understand why this has occurred?

  1. Project audit
  2. Lessons learned
  3. Organizational process assets
  4. Procurement audit
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Procurement audit

A procurement audit (D) is the most appropriate tool to investigate unexpected financial balances at project closure, especially with multiple suppliers. Procurement audits specifically examine procurement processes, supplier performance, contract execution, and financial reconciliation to identify where discrepancies occurred and why funds remain unspent. Option A (project audit) is broader and less specific to supplier-related financial issues. Option B (lessons learned) documents experiences but doesn't investigate current financial discrepancies. Option C (organizational process assets) are reference materials, not investigative tools.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. A general project audit is too broad; a procurement-specific audit better addresses supplier-related financial balances.
  • B. Lessons learned capture future insights but don't help explain the current unexpected financial balance.
  • C. Organizational process assets are historical records and templates, not investigative mechanisms for identifying financial discrepancies.

Question 63

A project manager identifies an issue between two team members that is affecting the development of one of the deliverables during the second iteration of a project.

How should the project manager address this issue to avoid any impact to the project?

  1. Send a warning to both team members indicating that if the issue continues, both will be removed from the project
  2. Escalate both team members to their respective functional managers and let them take the appropriate actions
  3. Contact the functional managers to request substitutes for the conflicting team members
  4. Schedule a meeting with both team members to understand the issue and facilitate a solution that satisfies both parties
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Schedule a meeting with both team members to understand the issue and facilitate a solution that satisfies both parties

The project manager should directly address interpersonal conflicts by bringing the parties together to understand the root cause and facilitate resolution. This direct, collaborative approach is most likely to resolve the issue quickly and maintain team cohesion while protecting the deliverable. The PM owns responsibility for team dynamics and project health and should intervene constructively at this level first.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Threats and warnings escalate conflict and damage team morale rather than solving the underlying issue.
  • B. Escalating to functional managers bypasses the PM's responsibility to manage team conflicts and removes the PM from the solution.
  • C. Removing team members is an extreme response without attempting resolution and disrupts project continuity.

Question 64

A healthcare company is in the process of deploying an innovative healthcare solution globally. The project team has completed a limited release.

The stakeholders have raised concerns about global healthcare guidelines and risks.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Evaluate lessons learned from similar projects prior to deployment.
  2. Perform a qualitative risk analysis on the identified project risks.
  3. Review compliance and regulatory requirements with stakeholders.
  4. Conduct a feasibility analysis of deploying the solution globally.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Review compliance and regulatory requirements with stakeholders.

When stakeholders raise concerns about global healthcare guidelines and risks after a limited release, the immediate priority is to review compliance and regulatory requirements with stakeholders. This addresses the concerns directly and ensures the project understands what must be met before global deployment. This is a prerequisite for moving forward and is more urgent than lessons learned analysis, qualitative risk analysis, or feasibility studies, all of which should be informed by the compliance requirements first.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Evaluating lessons learned is useful but secondary to understanding the specific compliance and regulatory requirements stakeholders have raised.
  • B. Qualitative risk analysis is appropriate, but only after understanding what compliance and regulatory requirements must be met.
  • D. Feasibility analysis should be conducted after compliance requirements are clarified, not before addressing stakeholder concerns about guidelines.

Question 65

A project manager has been assigned to a project after the charter has been approved. While reviewing the charter with the team, the project manager finds that some major budget items, necessary for achieving the project outcome, have been missed.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Immediately discuss this with the project sponsor and request to revisit the budget to ensure its accuracy
  2. Add the missing budget items to the risk log and present them in the next project steering committee
  3. Start the project and deal with these budget issues as they arise throughout the project life cycle
  4. Reduce the quality and cost of other deliverables to allow additional budget for the items that were missed
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Immediately discuss this with the project sponsor and request to revisit the budget to ensure its accuracy

The project manager should immediately escalate missed budget items to the project sponsor to revisit and correct the charter before project execution begins. The charter is a foundational governing document approved by the sponsor, and correcting it early prevents scope creep, unauthorized budget consumption, and project failure. This is proactive stakeholder management and risk mitigation at the critical point of project authorization.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Adding to the risk log delays resolution and treats a known budget omission as a future risk rather than a current control issue.
  • C. Starting the project with known budget shortfalls invites failure and violates basic financial governance and planning principles.
  • D. Reducing quality of other deliverables is an unauthorized scope or quality modification that should not be the PM's unilateral decision.

Question 66

A project manager is well informed on the industry standards of the organization and believes that they are not reflected in the project deliverables.

What should the project manager review next?

  1. Organizational process assets (OPAs)
  2. Quality process
  3. Project charter
  4. Quality management plan
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Quality management plan

When a project manager believes industry standards are not reflected in deliverables, the Quality Management Plan is the appropriate document to review next. The Quality Management Plan defines quality standards, quality assurance procedures, and quality control activities specific to the project. While OPAs contain organizational standards, the Quality Management Plan is the active project document that directly addresses how quality standards should be implemented in project deliverables. This is the logical next step before reviewing broader organizational assets.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. OPAs provide organizational context but don't specify how standards apply to this particular project's deliverables.
  • B. The quality process is too general; the specific quality management plan document is needed.
  • C. The project charter establishes project objectives but doesn't detail quality standard implementation for deliverables.

Question 67

A research and development team is finishing up a two year initiative. The project manager is focused on the closing activities for the project.

Which activity should be considered as a priority?

  1. Release the resources and plan for a project completion celebration.
  2. Ensure that knowledge transfer activities are executed as planned.
  3. Hold a steering committee meeting to inform them of the project completion.
  4. Mark the product backlog completion status and update the communications management plan.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Ensure that knowledge transfer activities are executed as planned.

In a research and development project, ensuring knowledge transfer is a critical closing activity because it preserves institutional learning, enables organizational capability building, and supports the transition of the initiative's outcomes to operations or the next phase. Knowledge transfer is a priority that has lasting organizational value and should be executed while the team and project context are still fresh.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While resource release and celebration are appropriate closing activities, they are less critical than ensuring knowledge is captured and transferred.
  • C. Informing the steering committee of completion is an important communication step but is secondary to completing substantive project closeout activities.
  • D. Updating administrative artifacts like the backlog status and communications plan are housekeeping activities that are less prioritized than knowledge transfer.

Question 68

A building management system (BMS) project is in its commissioning phase and handover to the operations team will commence soon. However, the project manager noted that both the project and operation teams are not able to properly operate the BMS. As a result, there is an increased risk of the project schedule being delayed.

What should the project manager have done to avoid this situation?

  1. Brought both teams together in a joint meeting to resolve the issue
  2. Made some adjustments to BMS to be more suitable for the teams
  3. Allocated a dedicated handover team at early stages of the project
  4. Allocated proper resources for training on BMS in the project plan
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Allocated proper resources for training on BMS in the project plan

The root cause of the commissioning delay is that neither the project team nor operations team can properly operate the BMS. This should have been prevented during project planning by allocating dedicated training resources as part of the project scope. Proper training ensures smooth knowledge transfer and operational readiness before handover, preventing schedule delays at critical project phases.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. A joint meeting at the commissioning phase is reactive problem-solving, not preventive planning.
  • B. Adjusting the BMS to be simpler addresses a symptom, not the root cause of inadequate operator capability.
  • C. A dedicated handover team is helpful but doesn't replace the need for proper training in operational procedures and system knowledge.

Question 69

The project manager is reviewing a project's progress and notices that one of the risks has become an issue.

What should the project manager do to address the situation?

  1. Initiate a change request to obtain additional funds from the management reserve
  2. Meet with the project team and customer to brainstorm about potential solutions
  3. Schedule a high-priority meeting with the project stakeholders to discuss the issue
  4. Collaborate with the relevant stakeholders on implementing the risk response plan
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Collaborate with the relevant stakeholders on implementing the risk response plan

When a previously identified risk has materialized into an actual issue, the appropriate response is to implement the risk response plan that was developed during risk planning. The project manager should collaborate with relevant stakeholders to execute the predetermined mitigation or contingency strategy. This response is already documented and approved, making it the most efficient and aligned approach. While brainstorming and high-priority meetings may be needed in some situations, the standard practice is to execute the planned response, which was specifically developed for this scenario.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Initiating a change request for management reserve should only occur after determining that the planned risk response is insufficient or unavailable.
  • B. Brainstorming new solutions wastes time when a risk response plan already exists and should be implemented first.
  • C. Scheduling a high-priority stakeholder meeting adds delay when the response strategy should already be documented and ready to execute.

Question 70

A project manager is managing a few innovation projects with a high level of uncertainty. The project manager is experiencing challenges with the large number of change requests issued due to the nature of the project.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Reduce the number of approvers required to implement a change request
  2. Request sponsor approval for all change requests to reduce the number of changes
  3. Initiate the number of iterations to reduce the number of change requests
  4. Add a fixed number of change requests allowed by the client on the project baseline
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Initiate the number of iterations to reduce the number of change requests

In high-uncertainty innovation projects, change requests are natural and expected as learning occurs. Rather than blocking changes, the project manager should embrace shorter, more frequent iterations. This allows the team to incorporate changes regularly, validate assumptions quickly, and reduce the accumulation of deferred changes. Iterations inherently manage the continuous flow of changes in uncertain environments.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Reducing approvers does not address the source of high change volume and can compromise governance and quality control.
  • B. Restricting changes by requiring sponsor approval contradicts agile principles and stifles the learning and adaptation necessary in innovation projects.
  • D. Capping the number of allowed changes prevents the project from responding to legitimate learnings and market feedback, which is critical for innovation.

Question 71

After gathering all the requirements for a project with dependencies on external stakeholders, the project team is finishing the second iteration. At this point, the project manager learns about a possible change in regulations that would prevent the product launch.

What should the project manager do to realize benefits?

  1. Add an entry in the risk log
  2. Implement the changes
  3. Review target benefits
  4. Improve the team's velocity
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Review target benefits

When a regulatory change threatens product launch feasibility, the project manager must first review and reassess the target benefits to understand which benefits remain viable under the new constraints and which may be affected. This evaluation informs all subsequent decisions about scope, timeline, and implementation approach, ensuring the project can still deliver meaningful value despite the regulatory obstacles.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Adding an entry to the risk log documents the threat but doesn't address how to realize benefits under changed conditions.
  • B. Implementing changes prematurely without understanding regulatory impact could worsen the situation.
  • D. Improving team velocity doesn't address the fundamental challenge posed by regulatory constraints.

Question 72

A hybrid project has just deployed, and the project manager is planning project closure with lessons learned workshops. A key stakeholder informs the project manager that having the Scrum team in the workshops is a waste of time because the project was delivered successfully.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Invite the Scrum team members as optional participants.
  2. Ask the Scrum team members to share retrospectives.
  3. Invite the Scrum team members as mandatory participants.
  4. Ask the scrum master to attend the workshops.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Invite the Scrum team members as mandatory participants.

The Scrum team should be mandatory participants in lessons learned workshops because they directly contributed to project delivery and possess valuable insights about what worked and what could improve. Their firsthand experience is essential for capturing accurate lessons. Project success doesn't diminish the importance of continuous improvement and organizational learning.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Optional participation will result in low attendance and incomplete feedback from those doing the work.
  • B. While retrospectives are valuable, formal lessons learned workshops require broader participation for completeness.
  • D. The scrum master facilitates but cannot replace the team's direct participation and perspectives.

Question 73

A project manager is assigned to a project where a vendor has been engaged to build a new system. One week before user acceptance testing (UAT) is scheduled, the vendor informs the project manager that they can only deliver half of the promised functions by the UAT start date.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Communicate with the vendor and project team and explore possibilities for resolving the issue
  2. Wait until the vendor cannot deliver and then invoke liquidated damages based on the contract
  3. Escalate to management and prepare for project closure by canceling the contract with this vendor
  4. Adjust the project schedule to accommodate the current development progress of the vendor
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Communicate with the vendor and project team and explore possibilities for resolving the issue

The project manager should immediately initiate collaborative communication with the vendor and project team to explore options for resolution. This may include prioritizing functions, adjusting timelines, phasing UAT, accelerating delivery, or other solutions. Early engagement demonstrates partnership and increases chances of finding workable solutions before the contractual dispute becomes adversarial or unrecoverable.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Waiting for failure to invoke damages is passive and allows preventable project harm; proactive resolution is superior.
  • C. Premature escalation to closure before exploring solutions abandons partnership and may be unnecessary given one week to coordinate.
  • D. Unilaterally adjusting the schedule without vendor input or problem-solving reduces accountability and may not resolve the delivery issue.

Question 74

An agile project team is looking to develop quality standards for a project.

How should the project manager coach the team?

  1. Determine the tools and techniques suitable for the project and ensure that testing is done early and continuously.
  2. Ensure that the definition of done (DoD) is provided when the product owner agrees that all acceptance criteria have been met for the user story.
  3. Insist that test-driven development is implemented along with the automated testing.
  4. Inform the team that user acceptance testing is required to ensure that the product owner accepts the solution.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Determine the tools and techniques suitable for the project and ensure that testing is done early and continuously.

To develop quality standards, the project manager should coach the team to identify appropriate tools and techniques for their specific context and to embrace early, continuous testing practices. This approach ensures quality is built in from the beginning rather than inspected in at the end, aligns with agile principles of continuous improvement, and allows the team to adapt their quality practices based on what works for their project.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. While definition of done is important, it is a reflection of quality standards rather than how to develop them, and it should be established before product owner acceptance is evaluated.
  • C. Mandating test-driven development and automated testing without first assessing the team's context, capabilities, and project needs is prescriptive rather than coaching-oriented.
  • D. Requiring user acceptance testing is valid but doesn't address how the team should establish their own quality standards and practices during development.

Question 75

An organization is using a hybrid delivery approach for a business project. The product owner, the person who was also managing the project, was promoted to a more senior role. A new project lead has joined the project.

Which artifact should the project lead use to ensure that the project benefits have been identified?

  1. Statement of work (SOW)
  2. Business case
  3. Product backlog
  4. Solution architecture
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Business case

The business case is the artifact that documents and identifies project benefits, business justification, and expected outcomes. As a new project lead transitioning from a previous product owner, the business case provides the authoritative reference for understanding what benefits the project was established to deliver and ensures continuity of this critical information.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. The Statement of Work defines scope and deliverables but does not specifically identify project benefits.
  • C. The product backlog contains prioritized work items but is not the primary artifact for documenting overall project benefits.
  • D. Solution architecture describes the technical design but does not document project benefits and organizational value.

75 questions in. Want the rest? The first half of the pack, free by email · The full pack

Question 76

A product company is transforming the way it develops and releases products in the market. Executives believe that this is a high-risk initiative, and this initiative must be successful.

What should the project manager do in this scenario?

  1. Develop a business case with assumptions for the new model
  2. Develop a communications management plan to inform the employees about the new business model
  3. Adopt an iterative rollout approach that delivers the highest business value earlier
  4. Develop a detailed sprint plan with clear deliverables
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Adopt an iterative rollout approach that delivers the highest business value earlier

For a high-risk, high-stakes initiative requiring success, an iterative rollout approach that delivers the highest business value earlier provides multiple strategic advantages: it reduces overall risk exposure by validating the model incrementally, demonstrates early wins to build stakeholder confidence, enables course correction based on real-world feedback, and increases the probability of overall initiative success. This approach is more prudent than a single big-bang implementation for a risky transformation.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. A business case with assumptions doesn't mitigate the execution risk of the new model.
  • B. Communications alone address awareness but don't reduce the operational risk of the transformation.
  • D. A detailed sprint plan is a planning artifact that doesn't address the fundamental strategy needed to manage high-risk delivery.

Question 77

A project manager works with a global virtual team. The team is facing difficulty in communicating with each other and often misses important messages. This difficulty leads to missed deadlines.

What should the project manager do to enhance project team effectiveness?

  1. Implement team colocation to improve communication
  2. Identify the root cause of communication issues
  3. Initiate daily communication of project progress
  4. Schedule a communications control board meeting
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Identify the root cause of communication issues

When a global virtual team is experiencing communication difficulties leading to missed deadlines, the project manager should first identify the root cause of the communication issues. Understanding whether the problems stem from time zone challenges, tool selection, clarity of messages, frequency, or cultural factors is essential to implementing an effective solution. Addressing the root cause ensures the corrective action actually resolves the underlying problem rather than treating symptoms.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Team colocation contradicts the virtual team structure and is often not feasible; it also skips root cause analysis.
  • C. Daily communication reporting may increase frequency but does not address the underlying cause of missed important messages.
  • D. A communications control board meeting is a formal governance response, not a diagnostic step to understand the actual communication barriers.

Question 78

A project manager is assigned to a new marketing campaign. The sponsor gives the project manager an approved project management plan for review and explains the scope, business requirements, deliverables, and stakeholders. The project manager asks to see the project charter to gain a better understanding of the project. The sponsor says the project is small and simple so there is no need for a project charter.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Develop the project charter and send it for approval.
  2. Explain that a project charter is necessary to ensure agreement on scope and deliverables and to define the project manager's responsibilities.
  3. Speak with peers about the need for a project charter.
  4. Agree that the project does not require a project charter, especially since the deliverables and milestones are included in the project management plan.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Explain that a project charter is necessary to ensure agreement on scope and deliverables and to define the project manager's responsibilities.

The project manager should explain that a project charter is necessary to ensure agreement on scope and deliverables and to define the project manager's responsibilities. The project charter is a foundational document that formally authorizes the project, regardless of project size. It provides the business case, success criteria, and the project manager's authority level. Without it, there is no formal authorization or clear definition of the manager's role and responsibilities, which creates governance and accountability gaps.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. The project manager shouldn't unilaterally develop the charter without sponsor agreement on its necessity.
  • C. Consulting peers about the need for a charter is indirect and doesn't address the sponsor directly.
  • D. Project size does not exempt a project from needing a charter; the charter is essential for authorization and clarity regardless of complexity.

Question 79

A senior business stakeholder with many years of experience is pressuring an agile team to deliver most of the promised functionality to the customer 18 months in the future as opposed to multiple, incremental deliveries over the course of the 18 months.

What should the project lead do next?

  1. Work with the agile team to schedule the incremental deliveries to enable delivery of business value sooner to the customer.
  2. Work with the stakeholder to understand what the concerns are while, at the same time, conveying the benefits of incremental deliveries.
  3. Schedule meetings with the customer to determine their ability to support multiple incremental deliveries.
  4. Provide details of the concern to the agile team and adjust their goals and release plans to conform to the stakeholder's request.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Work with the stakeholder to understand what the concerns are while, at the same time, conveying the benefits of incremental deliveries.

The project lead should first understand the stakeholder's underlying concerns and business drivers before taking action. By engaging in dialogue with the stakeholder while simultaneously educating them about the benefits of incremental delivery (faster time-to-value, earlier feedback, reduced risk, ability to pivot based on learnings), the project lead can address the root issue and build buy-in. This is a consultative approach that respects the stakeholder's experience while promoting agile best practices.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While scheduling incremental deliveries is the desired end state, it skips the crucial step of understanding and addressing the stakeholder's concerns first.
  • C. This involves the customer prematurely without first securing stakeholder alignment on the delivery approach.
  • D. Abandoning incremental delivery contradicts agile principles and eliminates the business benefits of frequent releases and feedback cycles.

Question 80

A customer's technical lead discussed a new feature with the project manager. The project manager believes the new feature will boost performance significantly and adds it as a high-priority item in the sprint backlog. At the end of the sprint, all of the planned stories were not completed because the new feature took more time.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Agree with the project team to modify and delete some of the stories in the current sprint backlog
  2. Obtain approval from the project team and add the new story to the product backlog
  3. Receive an agreement from the product owner and add the new story to the product backlog
  4. Negotiate with the scrum master before adding the new story to the sprint backlog
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Receive an agreement from the product owner and add the new story to the product backlog

In agile frameworks, the product owner has authority over backlog prioritization and composition. The project manager unilaterally added a feature to the sprint backlog without following proper governance. The correct process is to get the product owner's approval and place the new story in the product backlog for future prioritization, not the current sprint.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Deleting stories already committed to the sprint is a reaction that doesn't address the governance issue.
  • B. Team approval is not the authority needed; the product owner must approve backlog changes.
  • D. The scrum master facilitates process; the product owner owns backlog decisions.

Question 81

During the implementation phase of a construction project, the customer asked a key subcontractor to deliver a work package ahead of time. The subcontractor was not prepared for it and asked the project manager for additional budget.

What should the project manager do first?

  1. Update the risk register and project log, and manage the budget closely.
  2. Revise the project scope accordingly to cope with the budget changes.
  3. Submit a change request to accelerate the project as requested.
  4. Ask upper management for more funds, and update the project budget.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Submit a change request to accelerate the project as requested.

When the customer requests acceleration of a work package, this constitutes a formal change to the project baseline. The proper first action is to submit a change request through the formal change control process. This ensures the request is documented, impacts are assessed, and approvals are obtained before budget or schedule changes are implemented. A change request is the formal mechanism to handle customer-initiated modifications.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Updating registers and managing budget closely happens after change approval, not as the first action.
  • B. Revising scope without a formal change request bypasses change control procedures and governance.
  • D. Requesting funds from management without a formal change request lacks proper documentation and approval authority.

Question 82

A project manager is scheduled to meet with a client for their weekly risk management meeting. The project manager observed that one of the tasks which had external dependencies is delayed by one week. The project manager knows this will have an impact but does not know the exact details.

What two things should the project manager do? (Choose two.)

  1. Discuss the issue with the external supplier's authority.
  2. Gather additional information and estimate the impact.
  3. Wait for the client to raise a concern and collect more information.
  4. Review the lessons learned from similar past projects.
  5. Update the risk log and bring this up in the meeting with the client.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B, E. Gather additional information and estimate the impact; Update the risk log and bring this up in the meeting with the client.

When a risk event occurs (task delay with external dependency), the project manager must take two immediate actions. First, gather additional information and estimate the actual impact on the project timeline, costs, and other areas (option B). Second, update the risk log with this new information and bring it to the client meeting for transparency and joint decision-making (option E). These two steps ensure the project manager is prepared with facts and documentation before the client discussion.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While discussing with the external supplier may eventually be necessary, gathering internal impact information first is the priority.
  • C. Waiting for the client to raise concerns is passive and delays risk response; the PM should proactively communicate identified risks.
  • D. Reviewing lessons learned from past projects is helpful context but does not address the immediate need to assess this specific risk's impact.

Question 83

When trying to track project benefits, a project manager realizes that some key performance indicators (KPIs) are not yet defined.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Forward the issue to the benefit owner and ask them to collect the missing data and build the KPIs.
  2. Coordinate with the benefit owner to track and collect the missing data and build the KPIs.
  3. Work with the business analysts to track and collect the missing data and build the KPIs.
  4. Ask the program manager to track and collect the missing data and work to build the KPIs.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Coordinate with the benefit owner to track and collect the missing data and build the KPIs.

The project manager should coordinate with the benefit owner, as they are responsible for defining and tracking project benefits and associated KPIs. This is a collaborative effort where the benefit owner drives the definition of what benefits matter, while the project manager works with them to ensure proper tracking mechanisms are in place. This shared responsibility ensures accountability and alignment on success metrics.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Forwarding the issue without involvement abdicates the project manager's responsibility to coordinate and support benefits tracking.
  • C. Business analysts support the process but the benefit owner is the primary stakeholder responsible for defining KPIs related to business benefits.
  • D. The program manager has oversight but the benefit owner at the project level should take the lead in defining project-specific KPIs.

Question 84

A new major road project is starting, and the contractor has contractually committed to submitting regular status reports and participating in integration meetings.

Halfway through the project life cycle, the contractor stops participating in meetings and submitting reports, stating these items consume too much time.

What should the project manager do first?

  1. Assess the risk of the contractor not attending meetings and submitting reports for the rest of the project and escalate it to the project sponsor
  2. Remind the contractor that they committed to attending meetings and submitting reports per the contract
  3. Submit a claim for not fulfilling the contract terms and handle the claim in accordance with the alternative dispute resolution
  4. Speak with the company's lawyer and request that they demand the contractor fulfill their contractual commitments
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Remind the contractor that they committed to attending meetings and submitting reports per the contract

The first action should be to remind the contractor of their contractual obligations. This is the least escalatory approach and addresses the issue directly and professionally. The contractor may not realize the importance or may need clarification. Only if this direct communication fails should the project manager escalate to risk assessment, legal action, or dispute resolution.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Escalating to the sponsor without first attempting direct communication skips the necessary initial conversation.
  • C. Submitting a claim and pursuing dispute resolution is premature before addressing the issue directly.
  • D. Involving legal counsel immediately is an overly aggressive first step and damages the working relationship unnecessarily.

Question 85

A project manager is working on a major construction project. Part of the agreed-upon plan was to use a cloud-based system with a server that runs on high-speed internet service since most of the team members work virtually. The company needs to reduce operating costs as much as possible and management insists that the project will now use a system running on a conventional dial-up service.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Agree with management and continue working the project management plan.
  2. Evaluate the impact of this decision and communicate with management.
  3. Replace some of the team members that work virtually to help the company save money.
  4. Meet with management about their decision and ask them to get another project manager.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Evaluate the impact of this decision and communicate with management.

When management proposes a significant change to project infrastructure (from cloud-based high-speed internet to dial-up), the project manager's responsibility is to evaluate the potential impacts on the project and communicate findings to management. This allows informed decision-making. Simply agreeing (A) ignores professional duty; replacing team members (C) doesn't address the root issue; requesting a new PM (D) abdicates responsibility rather than solving the problem.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Blindly agreeing without impact analysis fails the project manager's fiduciary duty to evaluate and communicate consequences.
  • C. Replacing virtual team members doesn't solve the technical inadequacy of dial-up for a cloud-based system.
  • D. Escalating to remove oneself from the project avoids the responsibility to advise management on risks.

Question 86

In a retrospective, an agile team agreed to try work-in-progress limits for two iterations to reduce the number of stories carried over. Both iterations have now finished. Some team members like the change, while others find it restrictive. What should the project manager do?

  1. Make the limits permanent, since the whole team already agreed to them in the retrospective meeting.
  2. Drop the limits, since several team members find them too restrictive.
  3. Ask the sponsor to decide whether the team should keep the limits.
  4. Compare carry-over data from before and after the trial with the team and decide together.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Compare carry-over data from before and after the trial with the team and decide together.

Continuous improvement treats process changes as experiments whose results are checked against the goal they were meant to achieve. Here the goal was fewer carried-over stories, so the team should compare that measure before and after the trial and decide together whether to keep, adjust, or drop the limits. Basing the decision on evidence rather than opinion keeps the improvement process honest and builds the team's ownership of how it works.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Keeping the change without checking its results skips the evaluation step that makes it an improvement experiment.
  • B. Dropping the change on opinion alone ignores whether it actually reduced carry-over.
  • C. The team owns its process, so handing the decision to the sponsor is an unnecessary escalation.

Question 87

A company initiated a departmental transformation project improving the processes for the organization using a predictive approach. This is a critical project for the organization and, in the middle of the project, the project manager noticed that one of the deliverables cannot be produced due to a missing technical skill.

What should the project manager have done to avoid this?

  1. Asked the sponsor to identify all required skills during the planning of the project
  2. Identified all required skills after the kick-off of the project
  3. Planned all required training for the team during the onboarding process
  4. Identified all required skills during the planning of the project
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Identified all required skills during the planning of the project

In a predictive approach, thorough planning occurs upfront during project initiation and planning phases. The project manager should have identified all required skills during the planning phase so that gaps could be addressed before execution began through hiring, training, or resource allocation. Discovering skill gaps mid-project indicates inadequate planning.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While the sponsor may provide input, the project manager has primary responsibility for identifying required skills during planning.
  • B. Identifying skills after kick-off is reactive and does not prevent mid-project gaps from occurring.
  • C. Planning training during onboarding is reactive; skills should be identified during planning to allow time for proper preparation.

Question 88

A project manager has been given a critical, 5-day window and is allocated a maximum of US$100,000 as a contingency reserve. Subsequently, the project manager drafted a course of action based upon the best available information. Overall, five actions were required to be completed at a cost of US$20,000 and a duration of 1 day each. After 3 days of work, the project manager completed two actions and spent US$80,000.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Complete all actions and then inform the client of the additional cost and schedule overrun needed to complete the project
  2. Stop the work and raise a project change request to the change control board (CCB) for additional funds and a project schedule extension
  3. As the CPI and SPI are greater than 1.0, reevaluate and prioritize the remaining actions
  4. As the cost performance index (CPI) and schedule performance index (SPI) are less than 1.0, reevaluate and prioritize the remaining actions
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. As the cost performance index (CPI) and schedule performance index (SPI) are less than 1.0, reevaluate and prioritize the remaining actions

After 3 days, the project manager has completed 2 of 5 actions (40% progress) while spending $80,000 of $100,000 (80% of budget). The CPI is 0.5 ($40,000 earned / $80,000 spent) and SPI is 0.67 (2 days completed / 3 days elapsed), both less than 1.0, indicating underperformance. With only 2 days remaining and 3 actions left requiring 3 days of work, the project cannot be completed within constraints. The project manager must reevaluate and prioritize remaining actions based on this poor performance data.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Completing all actions and then informing the client ignores the real-time performance data and violates project control practices.
  • B. While escalation may eventually be needed, the manager should first analyze the situation and reprioritize rather than immediately request changes.
  • C. CPI and SPI being greater than 1.0 would indicate excellent performance; this is the opposite of the current situation.

Question 89

A project manager has been managing a highly complex project. The project manager has ensured that all of the required tasks have been completed. During a recent external audit. The project manager was informed of a heavy penalty being levied on the project for the latest module that was implemented.

What should the project manager have done to ensure that there were no liabilities arising from the recent implementation?

  1. Ensured that all defects identified during testing were resolved before implementation
  2. Ensured that all of the required tasks identified in the scope were completed successfully
  3. Ensured that all documentation was completed post implementation before closing the project
  4. Ensured that all the required approvals were received per the organizational procedures
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Ensured that all the required approvals were received per the organizational procedures

The project manager should have ensured all required approvals were obtained per organizational procedures before implementation. Implementing without proper approvals creates legal and compliance liabilities. Approvals serve as gatekeeping mechanisms to verify readiness, obtain authorization, and ensure regulatory compliance. The penalty arose from implementation without proper approval, making this the critical preventive measure.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Resolving defects is important for quality but doesn't prevent compliance penalties from unauthorized implementation.
  • B. Completing required tasks addresses scope, not the specific issue of authorization and approval for implementation.
  • C. Post-implementation documentation doesn't prevent penalties; approvals must occur before implementation.

Question 90

A project manager has team members around the world in many different time zones. Project work frequently stalls because people in one office need to wait until another office is awake to have questions answered.

What should the project manager have done to avoid this?

  1. Ensured that the project would be the highest priority for all team members
  2. Planned and scheduled tasks and work packages to overcome geographical and time zone challenges
  3. Learned more about how each team member prefers to communicate before assigning project work
  4. Used communication tools, such as video conferencing, so different offices could communicate
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Planned and scheduled tasks and work packages to overcome geographical and time zone challenges

The root cause of work stalls in a globally distributed team is poor planning for time zone challenges. By planning and scheduling tasks and work packages with geographical and time zone constraints in mind, the project manager can structure work so that dependencies don't create waiting periods. This involves thoughtful task sequencing, clear handoffs between offices, overlapping coverage strategies, and asynchronous work design. Proactive scheduling addresses the systemic issue rather than relying on communication tools or priority-setting, which cannot eliminate time zone delays without proper work structure.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Making the project the highest priority doesn't overcome the physical reality that offices in different time zones must sleep at different times.
  • C. Understanding communication preferences helps team collaboration but does nothing to prevent the inherent time zone-based delays in work dependencies.
  • D. Communication tools like video conferencing require people to be awake simultaneously and don't solve the fundamental problem of asynchronous work delays.

Question 91

A project schedule risk has turned into an issue. The project manager foresees delays in project execution.

What should the project manager do to resolve the issue?

  1. Escalate the issue to senior leadership for resolution
  2. Work with relevant stakeholders to determine possible solutions
  3. Update the schedule baseline to the new project time line
  4. Update the risk management plan and send it to the project team
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Work with relevant stakeholders to determine possible solutions

When a schedule risk has materialized into an issue, the project manager's first action should be to work collaboratively with relevant stakeholders to identify and evaluate possible solutions. This collaborative problem-solving approach explores all options before deciding on escalation, schedule changes, or other corrective actions. It respects stakeholder input and enables informed decision-making.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Escalation should occur after attempting problem resolution with stakeholders, not as the first step.
  • C. Updating the baseline prematurely without exploring solutions is reactive and may lock in delays unnecessarily.
  • D. Updating the risk management plan does not resolve the issue; it documents it for future reference but takes no corrective action.

Question 92

An agile project is running its fifth iteration out of eight. After the last iteration planning the team was informed that there is a new competitor in the market, and it is necessary to move faster to ensure market share is not missed.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Add the competitor's functionalities to the product backlog to improve the product
  2. Ask the sponsor to add more people to the team
  3. Help the team to find a new approach to launch the product as soon as possible
  4. Ask the team to increase the velocity to launch the product as soon as possible
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Help the team to find a new approach to launch the product as soon as possible

When market conditions change mid-project, the agile project manager should help the team find a new approach to accelerate delivery, such as reprioritizing the backlog, eliminating non-essential features, or improving processes. This focuses on smart execution and value delivery rather than unsustainable solutions. The goal is finding an effective strategy to meet the new business need.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Adding competitor functionalities increases scope and delays delivery rather than accelerating it to capture market share.
  • B. Adding more people mid-sprint typically decreases velocity due to onboarding overhead and communication complexity, not increasing it.
  • D. Simply asking the team to increase velocity is not a sustainable or realistic solution; velocity is determined by the team's actual capacity, not willpower.

Question 93

A team member shares with their functional manager some negative details about the performance of another team member that was discussed during the retrospective. The project manager finds out about this discussion.

What two actions should the project manager take? (Choose two.)

  1. Contact the team member's functional manager and invite them to the next retrospective
  2. Meet with the entire team to review the ground rules about safe environments
  3. Meet with the product owner to talk about the situation
  4. Contact the team member to explain what information can be shared outside the team
  5. Meet with the sponsor to review the situation
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B, D. Meet with the entire team to review the ground rules about safe environments; Contact the team member to explain what information can be shared outside the team

The project manager should take two actions: (B) meet with the entire team to review ground rules about safe environments, reinforcing retrospective confidentiality and establishing that retrospectives are safe spaces for honest discussion without external consequences, and (D) contact the team member to clarify what information can be shared externally, ensuring they understand retrospective confidentiality norms. These actions protect psychological safety and prevent future breaches of trust.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Inviting the functional manager to retrospectives may further compromise the safe environment; retrospectives are meant for the core team.
  • C. The product owner is not the appropriate person to address team psychological safety violations.
  • E. Escalating to the sponsor is unnecessary and overly formal for addressing team ground rule violations.

Question 94

The project manager is having difficulty obtaining approval of the project requirements because there is disagreement among the project stakeholders. This issue is putting the project schedule at risk.

What should the project manager do first to facilitate the approval of project requirements'?

  1. Review the project charter
  2. Perform a stakeholder analysis
  3. Identify the source of the disagreement
  4. Hold a team-building event
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Identify the source of the disagreement

Before taking any other action, the project manager must first identify the source of disagreement among stakeholders. Understanding whether disagreements stem from different interpretations, competing priorities, incomplete information, or misaligned expectations is essential to selecting the appropriate resolution strategy. Without identifying the root cause, any intervention may prove ineffective.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Reviewing the project charter is helpful context but does not directly address the immediate problem of identifying why stakeholders disagree.
  • B. Performing stakeholder analysis, while useful for overall engagement, is not the first tactical step when disagreement already exists and needs immediate resolution.
  • D. A team-building event is a relationship-building exercise, not a problem-solving tool for specific requirement disagreements.

Question 95

A company has a transformation project in progress. During a planning session, several stakeholders are in constant disagreement and often use personal arguments to support their position. Team members are getting frustrated with the situation.

What should the project manager have done to avoid this situation?

  1. Established ground rules before the discussion had started
  2. Reinforced that higher-level management has the decision power
  3. Invited a high-level sponsor to the meeting to reduce the level of disagreement
  4. Asked stakeholders not to voice their opinions during the meeting
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Established ground rules before the discussion had started

Establishing ground rules at the beginning of a planning session sets expectations for respectful, professional discourse and prevents personal arguments from derailing discussions. Ground rules establish psychological safety, define acceptable communication norms, and provide a reference point for the project manager to redirect unproductive behavior before frustration builds among team members. This is a preventive, proactive approach to managing stakeholder dynamics.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Reinforcing management authority may suppress dialogue without addressing the underlying disagreement.
  • C. Inviting high-level sponsors may intimidate stakeholders and reduce honest discussion rather than facilitate it.
  • D. Asking stakeholders to withhold opinions prevents necessary discussion and decision-making.

Question 96

A project to develop a large hydropower plant is in the implementation phase and is managed using a hybrid approach.

What should the project manager do to ensure full compliance of quality requirements during the execution phase?

  1. Analyze the quality requirements.
  2. Plan quality management
  3. Continually survey the quality of the deliverable
  4. Set up quality policies and procedures
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Continually survey the quality of the deliverable

During the execution phase of a project, the project manager must continually monitor and survey the quality of deliverables to ensure compliance with quality requirements. This ongoing quality control activity detects issues in real-time, allowing for immediate corrective action rather than discovering problems later.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Analyzing quality requirements is a planning activity that should have already been completed before execution began.
  • B. Planning quality management occurs in the planning phase, not the execution phase where monitoring is the focus.
  • D. Setting up policies and procedures is a foundational planning activity, not an execution-phase compliance mechanism.

Question 97

A project manager is working on a construction project. The company owner asks the project manager to provide cost estimates for the new decoration project within 4 hours.

How will the project manager be able to complete this task?

  1. Call a meeting with the project team to identify the most appropriate approach
  2. Tell the owner that a rough order of magnitude will be provided
  3. Contact a subject matter expert (SME) for advice and consultation
  4. Tell the owner that the task requires more time and expertise
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Tell the owner that a rough order of magnitude will be provided

When faced with an unrealistic timeline for detailed cost estimation, the project manager should set appropriate expectations by offering a rough order of magnitude (ROM) estimate. This acknowledges the constraint while providing useful ballpark information that can guide initial decisions. ROM estimates are standard practice when time is limited and are understood to have wide variance ranges, making this the most practical and honest approach.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Calling a team meeting within 4 hours may not yield accurate estimates and doesn't directly address the owner's expectation management.
  • C. Consulting an SME alone doesn't solve the fundamental issue of insufficient time for thorough estimation.
  • D. Simply refusing the task doesn't provide value and may damage stakeholder relationships; offering a ROM is more constructive.

Question 98

During the design phase, a project manager realizes that the project will benefit from using adaptive tools. The effectiveness of this approach has been proven in past projects inside the organization.

What should the project manager do first?

  1. Update project documents to include adaptive tools and artifacts and plan the first iterative session
  2. Contact the project sponsor and request new team members who are familiar with adaptive projects
  3. Confirm team capabilities before introducing adaptive tools and artifacts to the project
  4. Freeze the design stage and look for an external resource to run iterative design at extra cost
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Confirm team capabilities before introducing adaptive tools and artifacts to the project

Before implementing adaptive tools and artifacts, the project manager must first assess whether the team has the necessary capabilities and skills to work effectively with adaptive methodologies. Confirming team capabilities ensures a smooth transition and increases the likelihood of success. This is a prerequisite step before updating documents or making other changes.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Updating documents and planning iterations should occur after confirming the team is ready to use adaptive approaches.
  • B. Requesting new team members is premature before assessing the current team's actual capabilities and potential for development.
  • D. Freezing the project and outsourcing work is an extreme measure that should not be the first step when the organization has proven success with adaptive tools.

Question 99

A project manager is planning a project with multiple work packages. Each work package has its own defined scope, but funding will be at the project level.

How should the project manager determine if the allocated resource budget is sufficient to cover the resource costs of the project?

  1. Estimate the costs at the work package level and add those costs to calculate the total cost of the project and compare it to the allocated budget.
  2. Create a budget burndown and a scope burnup and then verify that the project scope is completed before the allocated budget is depleted.
  3. Divide the allocated budget by the number of work packages and verify that each work package can be completed within the allocated budget.
  4. Fund each work package in the order of its importance and shift any remaining scope from non-funded work packages to funded work packages.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Estimate the costs at the work package level and add those costs to calculate the total cost of the project and compare it to the allocated budget.

To determine if allocated budget is sufficient for multiple work packages with individual scopes, the project manager must estimate costs at the work package level and aggregate them to the project total. This bottom-up approach ensures that each work package's specific requirements are costed accurately, and the sum can be compared against the allocated project-level budget. This method accounts for the distinct scope of each work package while respecting the project-level funding structure.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Burndown and burnup charts track progress during execution but don't help with initial budget sufficiency determination during planning.
  • C. Dividing budget equally by work package count ignores that each work package has defined but likely different scope and cost requirements.
  • D. Prioritizing and shifting scope based on funding is a mitigation strategy only after determining insufficiency, not a method to determine if budget is adequate.

Question 100

Some of the team members who are working on a new software tool are in a public space, arguing over a new feature being coded instead of completing the coding.

How should the project manager handle this situation and get the team to complete the task?

  1. Contact the human resources (HR) department to tell them there is an argument in a public space and that they need to intervene immediately.
  2. Engage in the conversation in the public space by telling them the expectations of the feature and advise them to return to their workspace.
  3. Listen to the argument from a nearby location to understand the situation, then offer insight into the features when the team is calm.
  4. Bring the team members to the meeting room to discuss the new feature and to reach a common understanding of the necessary coding.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Bring the team members to the meeting room to discuss the new feature and to reach a common understanding of the necessary coding.

Bringing the team to a private meeting room allows for a calm, focused discussion away from public disruption. This approach respects the team members' professional dignity, addresses the root issue of disagreement about the feature, and enables collaborative problem-solving. Option A escalates unnecessarily; Option B addresses the symptom in public rather than the underlying disagreement; Option C delays intervention too long and risks continued disruption.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Involving HR for a technical disagreement is unnecessary escalation and treats a work issue as a disciplinary matter.
  • B. Engaging in public space maintains the confrontational atmosphere and doesn't provide a conducive environment for resolution.
  • C. Listening from a distance delays intervention and doesn't actively facilitate resolution of the underlying disagreement.

100 questions in. Want the rest? The first half of the pack, free by email · The full pack

Question 101

A key project stakeholder does not attend any of the project meetings and is providing false information that the project team is not delivering on time.

What should the project manager do to address this situation?

  1. Email the latest status report to the key stakeholder.
  2. Discuss communication needs with the key stakeholder.
  3. Create a new communication artifact for the key stakeholder.
  4. Share the meeting recordings with the key stakeholder.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Discuss communication needs with the key stakeholder.

The root issue is a breakdown in communication and engagement with this stakeholder. Before implementing new communication artifacts or methods, the project manager should directly discuss communication needs and preferences with the stakeholder. This conversation will uncover why they're not attending meetings and what communication approach would work better for them, addressing the source of misinformation.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Emailing a status report to someone already receiving false information doesn't address the underlying engagement problem.
  • C. Creating new artifacts without understanding the stakeholder's actual needs is premature and may not solve the real issue.
  • D. Sharing recordings doesn't address the stakeholder's apparent disengagement or lack of meeting attendance.

Question 102

A project manager is starting a new project, and the project team is located in different countries. The team was going to use a specific tool to hold virtual meetings. However, that tool is not available in one team member's country.

How should the project manager deal with this situation?

  1. Contact the project sponsor to have the team member removed from the project
  2. Ask the team member to move to another location where the tool is available
  3. Investigate alternative tools for virtual meetings that are available to all team members
  4. Start the project and use email to communicate with the team member until the tool is available
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Investigate alternative tools for virtual meetings that are available to all team members

The project manager must ensure all team members can participate fully regardless of location or regulatory constraints. Investigating alternative virtual meeting tools that work in all team members' countries is the only solution that maintains team integrity, inclusion, and productivity. This is a practical problem-solving approach that respects both project needs and individual circumstances.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Removing a capable team member due to a tool availability issue is an extreme and unnecessary escalation that wastes human resources.
  • B. Asking a team member to relocate is unrealistic, costly, and disproportionate to the problem of finding an alternative communication tool.
  • D. Using email as a workaround for a distributed team is inefficient for real-time collaboration and undermines the project's communication effectiveness.

Question 103

A project manager is leading an engineering project. The project manager must obtain some certifications before mass production, which is scheduled in 3 months. The certification process will require at least 6 months.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Discuss extending the mass production timeline by 3 months with the project sponsor.
  2. Assess and evaluate the certification process and understand the best and worst case scenarios.
  3. Engage a consultant to shorten the certification process to meet the schedule requirement.
  4. Meet with senior management to discuss the possibility of an extension to the project timeline.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Assess and evaluate the certification process and understand the best and worst case scenarios.

When facing a significant schedule constraint (3 months available vs. 6 months required), the project manager must first assess and evaluate the certification process thoroughly to understand best-case, worst-case, and most-likely scenarios. This analysis will inform whether extension is necessary, if acceleration is possible, or if alternative approaches exist, providing the data needed before engaging leadership.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Discussing extension with the sponsor is premature without first understanding the certification process details and actual timeline requirements.
  • C. Engaging a consultant to accelerate assumes acceleration is possible without first evaluating whether that's feasible for a regulatory certification.
  • D. Meeting with senior management should occur after the project manager has thoroughly assessed the situation and can present informed options.

Question 104

While reviewing prototypes, the quality team found some deviations that do not affect the mam functionality but have the potential to be an issue in the future. To avoid major problems in the future, the team recommends corrective actions that will require additional funds. The project is already struggling to stay on budget and has even used some of the contingency reserves.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Ask the product designer why the deviation was not considered in the design phase
  2. Report to the project sponsor that the product is working and the project is struggling with the budget
  3. Evaluate and initiate the change request process with the stakeholders
  4. Ask the quality team to discard the sample and test again with a new sample
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Evaluate and initiate the change request process with the stakeholders

When quality issues are identified that require corrective actions and additional funding, the proper response is to evaluate the issue and initiate the formal change request process with stakeholders. This ensures transparency, allows stakeholders to make informed decisions about trading off quality improvements against budget constraints, and maintains project controls. Blaming the designer (A) doesn't address the current situation, reporting without proposing solutions (B) is incomplete communication, and discarding findings (D) ignores a legitimate quality concern. The change request process is the appropriate mechanism for addressing scope and budget impacts.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While root cause analysis has value, it doesn't address the immediate decision about corrective actions and budget impacts.
  • B. Simply reporting the problem without proposing solutions and following proper change control leaves stakeholders unable to make decisions.
  • D. Discarding quality findings is unprofessional and ignores legitimate concerns about future product reliability.

Question 105

A company changed the product owner on an existing project. The new product owner has less knowledge of the product than everybody else on the team. Due to the product owner's lack of knowledge, the team does not consider the opinions of the product owner seriously and mostly relies on the project manager's opinion.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Work with the project management office (PMO) manager to generate an onboarding plan for the new product owner.
  2. Schedule time to share insights with the new product owner about the product and project information.
  3. Assume the role of the product owner while the product owner gets familiar with the product.
  4. Organize a team-building activity and ask the team to respect the opinions of the new product owner.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Schedule time to share insights with the new product owner about the product and project information.

The project manager should directly support the new product owner's development by sharing product and project insights. This addresses the root cause, the product owner's knowledge gap, while respecting the product owner's role and authority. Scheduling dedicated time to transfer knowledge builds the product owner's capability and credibility with the team, enabling them to make better decisions independently.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While onboarding through PMO is helpful, it's indirect and may not address the immediate knowledge transfer needed for current project decisions.
  • C. Assuming the product owner role undermines the product owner's authority and violates the separation of responsibilities fundamental to agile and traditional project management.
  • D. Team-building activities alone don't solve the underlying problem of the product owner's lack of product knowledge, which is causing the team's distrust.

Question 106

A team is preparing the closing phase and building a plan for the next phase. One of the project sponsors is complaining that the last phase had some quality deliverable issues. However, the quality acceptance document was signed.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Postpone the next project phase until the impact of the quality issues is assessed.
  2. Reopen the quality acceptance documentation to add the sponsor's complaints.
  3. Schedule a quality review meeting and include the sponsor's complaints.
  4. Review best practices and lessons learned and apply them to the project plan.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Review best practices and lessons learned and apply them to the project plan.

The appropriate response is to review best practices and lessons learned from the quality issues and apply them to the upcoming project phase plan. Although quality acceptance was signed, the sponsor's complaint about quality issues is valuable feedback for process improvement. This approach respects the formal acceptance while capturing learning to prevent similar issues going forward. This is the standard practice in iterative and phase-based project management.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Postponing the phase is excessive since acceptance was already documented and doesn't address the root cause.
  • B. Reopening signed acceptance documents undermines the formal approval process and creates scope creep.
  • C. A quality review meeting alone addresses the complaint but doesn't take action to improve future phases.

Question 107

A project manager is assigned to a multiyear project. During project execution, the customer delegates a new representative who contacts the project manager directly with a concern about their participation in status meetings. The representative wants to contact team members directly.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Send the new representative the approved project management and communications management plans.
  2. Reach out to the customer directly for assistance in incorporating the new representative into the project management plan.
  3. Meet with the new representative to determine their understanding of the project and address their concerns.
  4. Meet with the project sponsor to discuss how to incorporate the new representative in the project.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Meet with the new representative to determine their understanding of the project and address their concerns.

The project manager should first meet directly with the new representative to understand their concerns and clarify their role and expectations. This one-on-one conversation allows the PM to explain the project structure, communication protocols, and why the current structure exists. This direct engagement addresses the immediate concern, establishes rapport, and may resolve the issue without escalation. Only if this meeting doesn't resolve concerns would further action be needed.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Sending documents without discussion is passive and doesn't address the underlying concern or relationship-building need.
  • B. Involving the customer prematurely bypasses the opportunity for direct problem-solving.
  • D. Escalating to the sponsor is premature before attempting direct resolution with the stakeholder.

Question 108

A project's customer is furious.

When the customer arrived at the project site, they discovered that one of their requirements was not met.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Discuss and agree with the customer to implement the missing requirement
  2. Refer to the requirements traceability matrix and analyze the requirement
  3. Consult the scope management plan with the customer to understand the gap
  4. Analyze the benefits management plan and implement the needed change
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Refer to the requirements traceability matrix and analyze the requirement

When a requirement appears to be missing, the project manager should first consult the requirements traceability matrix to analyze whether the requirement was actually captured, tracked, and addressed. This systematic review identifies the gap, whether the requirement was missed, changed, deprioritized, or never properly documented. This analysis guides the appropriate corrective action.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Immediately agreeing to implement without analysis could add scope inappropriately or repeat the same errors that led to the initial gap.
  • C. The scope management plan documents scope decisions but the RTM specifically traces requirements to deliverables and is the right tool for analyzing this gap.
  • D. The benefits management plan addresses value realization but doesn't help analyze whether this specific requirement was properly managed and traced.

Question 109

A project manager is assigned to a building construction project. The project manager has taken an agile course and wants to use agile practices in the project.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Choose the agile practices that can be implemented in this type of construction project and apply them
  2. Hire a consultant to provide a second opinion about whether agile can be applied to a construction project
  3. Review the stages of the project to allocate additional budget for agile resources
  4. Assign a scrum master to the project to implement agile practices in the project
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Choose the agile practices that can be implemented in this type of construction project and apply them

The project manager should select and apply agile practices that are appropriate for a construction project, rather than trying to implement full agile methodology wholesale. Agile principles like iterative delivery, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive planning can benefit construction projects, but they must be adapted to the constraints and nature of construction work. This pragmatic approach respects the project context while leveraging agile benefits.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Hiring a consultant adds cost and delays decision-making without the project manager taking ownership of the approach.
  • C. Allocating additional budget for agile resources assumes agile requires more funding, which is not necessarily true.
  • D. Assigning a scrum master to implement full agile practices in construction may be inappropriate for the project's nature and requirements.

Question 110

A project scope statement has been approved, and the project manager and core team have been assigned to the project. Suddenly, the project manager takes a temporary leave of absence due to a medical emergency. While the project manager is on leave, the team develops the project schedule.

When the project manager returns, a detailed schedule is almost complete.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Ensure that the schedule is aligned with the vision and objectives.
  2. Escalate the compliance issue to the project management office (PMO).
  3. Congratulate the team and move on to the execution phase.
  4. Develop a new detailed schedule with the team and project sponsor.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Ensure that the schedule is aligned with the vision and objectives.

Upon returning, the project manager must ensure the schedule aligns with the approved scope statement, project vision, and objectives. This is a governance responsibility to maintain baseline integrity. While the team's work is appreciated, the PM must verify alignment before proceeding. Escalating (B) is premature without first reviewing the work; congratulating and moving on (C) skips critical validation; developing a new schedule (D) is excessive if the existing one is sound.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Escalating a compliance concern should occur only after the PM has reviewed whether actual misalignment exists.
  • C. Moving forward without validating schedule alignment to project objectives risks downstream problems.
  • D. Creating an entirely new schedule discards the team's work unnecessarily and wastes effort.

Question 111

A medium-sized company has been exploring new marketing tactics with regard to launching a new product. New product creation is no small task. In the end, it was too big of an expenditure for the company to undertake.

What should the project manager do in the future when working on new product projects?

  1. Make use of kanban boards so all stakeholders have a clear view of the project and provide their help accordingly
  2. Train the team to first find the minimum viable product (MVP) that will deliver value to the customer
  3. Increase the contingency reserve and prepare the team for applying fast-failing techniques when the estimates veer from the initial plan
  4. Adopt a chain management approach, developing products based on the same platform and infrastructure
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Train the team to first find the minimum viable product (MVP) that will deliver value to the customer

The company overextended itself by attempting a full product launch rather than identifying the minimum viable product (MVP) first. Training teams to find the MVP, the smallest feature set that delivers customer value, enables iterative delivery, early feedback, and controlled scope. This agile approach prevents the expensive all-or-nothing trap that caused failure here.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Kanban boards improve visibility but do not address the root cause of over-scoping and excessive expenditure on new product initiatives.
  • C. Increasing contingency and preparing for fast-failing does not prevent the initial problem of committing to an overly large scope before validating market demand.
  • D. Chain management and platform-based development are long-term infrastructure strategies unrelated to the specific challenge of reducing product development scope.

Question 112

A project manager on a hybrid project learns that several team members have been pasting client workshop notes, which include customer names and contract terms, into a public generative AI chatbot to produce summaries. The organization has an AI acceptable-use policy, but the project has not yet adopted any rules for AI tools. What should the project manager do FIRST?

  1. Ban every AI tool on the project immediately and record the incident in the issue log for the sponsor to review.
  2. Have the team stop pasting client data into the public chatbot, then review the organization's AI policy with the team and agree on approved tools, data handling, and output review.
  3. Escalate to the sponsor and wait for an executive decision on whether the team may use AI tools.
  4. Let the team keep using the chatbot but ask every member to check each summary carefully for accuracy before sharing it.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Have the team stop pasting client data into the public chatbot, then review the organization's AI policy with the team and agree on approved tools, data handling, and output review.

Project governance is built from the organization's process assets, including its policies. The existing AI acceptable-use policy should be turned into clear project rules: which tools are approved, what data may be entered into them, and who remains accountable for reviewing their outputs. Agreeing these rules with the team stops the unsafe handling of client data while keeping the productivity benefit, and it applies the organization's established policy instead of improvising a new one.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. A blanket ban ignores the organization's existing policy and discards legitimate value instead of setting proper rules.
  • C. The organization already has a policy to apply, so escalating for a decision is premature and delays stopping the data exposure.
  • D. Checking summaries for accuracy does nothing to stop confidential client data from being entered into an unapproved public tool.

Question 113

A project manager recently finished a project and started managing a new project with a different supervisor. As part of the early project activities, the supervisor from the original project is assigned to the team as a nonsupervisory resource and immediately begins challenging all decisions made by the current supervisor.

What should the project manager do to resolve this conflict?

  1. Ensure the new supervisor takes the lead when being challenged
  2. Give the project team time to work through the issues with the new supervisor
  3. Immediately remove the resource from the project team
  4. Communicate with the resource on the roles and responsibilities of this project
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Communicate with the resource on the roles and responsibilities of this project

The root cause of the conflict is unclear roles and responsibilities. The former supervisor may not understand their position has changed or may be uncertain about the reporting structure. By clearly communicating the roles, responsibilities, and authority structure of the current project, the project manager addresses the source of the conflict professionally rather than through avoidance or removal.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Having the new supervisor take the lead only addresses symptoms and doesn't resolve the underlying confusion about roles.
  • B. Giving time without clarification perpetuates confusion and allows the conflict to continue undermining project dynamics.
  • C. Immediately removing the resource is an extreme measure that doesn't address the actual problem and damages team relationships unnecessarily.

Question 114

An agile team releases a payments app every two weeks. The app must meet security, accessibility, and financial regulatory requirements. The compliance manager is concerned that the team will only discover compliance gaps at the final audit before the public launch. What should the project manager do?

  1. Plan one comprehensive compliance audit for the final release immediately before the public launch.
  2. Require the compliance manager to sign off every user story before the team may start it.
  3. Let the product owner add compliance stories to the backlog whenever an external auditor finds a gap.
  4. Build compliance criteria into the definition of done and review compliance measures each iteration.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Build compliance criteria into the definition of done and review compliance measures each iteration.

In iterative delivery, compliance should be checked continuously rather than left to a final gate. Including the security, accessibility, and regulatory criteria in the definition of done makes compliance part of every increment, and reviewing agreed compliance measures with the compliance manager each iteration shows how far the product complies at any time. Gaps are then found while they are small and inexpensive to fix.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. A single audit at the end is the late discovery the compliance manager is already worried about.
  • B. Pre-approving every story creates a bottleneck and still does not measure whether delivered increments comply.
  • C. Waiting for auditors to find gaps is reactive and leaves compliance unmeasured between audits.

Question 115

During the execution of a project the project manager notices that only one team member has one of the technical skills needed to build the product. The project manager is afraid this might have a future impact on the quality and schedule, because most of the upcoming activities will require at least three people with this specific skill.

What two actions should the project manager take to prevent the team from being unqualified? (Choose two.)

  1. Exclude the activities from the roadmap
  2. Encourage working in pairs and knowledge sharing
  3. Teach the entire team the new skill
  4. Facilitate a training event with an external tracer
  5. Increase the time estimates on the activities that require such abilities
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B, D. Encourage working in pairs and knowledge sharing; Facilitate a training event with an external tracer

To prevent team qualification gaps, the project manager should both encourage knowledge sharing through pair work (B) and facilitate external training (D). These complementary approaches build internal capability through peer learning while simultaneously leveraging external expertise to rapidly upskill the team in the critical technical skill needed for upcoming activities.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Excluding activities avoids the problem rather than solving it and likely violates project scope.
  • C. Teaching the entire team internally may be inefficient given the complexity and the need for rapid skill development.
  • E. Increasing time estimates does not address the root cause of insufficient skilled resources; it merely accommodates the problem.

Question 116

During project execution, a conflict occurs between the project manager and one of the team members at every project team meeting. The ongoing conflict is preventing tasks and deliverables from being completed. The project manager contemplates changing their leadership style.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Review the set of responsibilities with the team member
  2. Avoid the team member to prevent further conflicts
  3. Escalate the situation to the project sponsor
  4. Review the personnel skill documents
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Review the set of responsibilities with the team member

When a conflict occurs between a project manager and team member that affects deliverables, the first step should be to address the root cause through direct communication and clarification of responsibilities. Reviewing the set of responsibilities helps establish clear expectations and understanding, which often resolves recurring conflicts. This is a constructive, direct approach that addresses the problem at its source before escalation becomes necessary.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Avoiding the team member ignores the problem and allows conflicts to continue affecting project delivery.
  • C. Escalation should be a last resort after direct resolution attempts have failed, not the first response.
  • D. Reviewing skill documents does not address the interpersonal conflict occurring at team meetings.

Question 117

A startup company has just appointed a CEO that has no prior project experience. The CEO wants to execute projects with their own resources and has appointed a project manager.

What should the project manager recommend that the CEO do first?

  1. Create a framework to justify project execution.
  2. Utilize an agile approach for all upcoming projects.
  3. Create a framework to support project success.
  4. Utilize a predictive approach for all upcoming projects.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Create a framework to support project success.

A startup CEO with no project experience needs a foundational framework to support successful project execution. Creating a project management framework establishes processes, governance, and standards that enable consistent project delivery. This is more fundamental than choosing delivery approaches, which should be determined after the framework is in place based on project characteristics.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Justifying project execution is less critical than establishing the infrastructure to support it.
  • B. Choosing agile approach before framework establishment is premature and ignores that different projects may need different approaches.
  • D. Choosing predictive approach before framework establishment is premature and ignores that different projects may need different approaches.

Question 118

A project manager finds it challenging to comply with standardized processes for knowledge transfer. The project teams and stakeholders are scattered around field sites, the office, and remote locations. In addition, some team members have limited access to the electronically shared files.

How should the project manager manage this challenge?

  1. Study the environment and the available resources to determine which approach to use.
  2. Send the intended information through email since it is the primary communication tool.
  3. Communicate a strong message to the team explaining the importance of knowledge transfer.
  4. Request changes in the processes since it is not suitable for the company environment.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Study the environment and the available resources to determine which approach to use.

Given the distributed nature of the project environment, with team members at field sites, offices, and remote locations, and varying access to electronic resources, the project manager must assess the specific constraints and resources available before selecting a knowledge transfer approach. A standardized process may not be feasible for all team members, so the manager needs to evaluate which methods will work best given the environmental realities (e.g., in-person at field sites, email for those with limited connectivity, shared drives for office-based staff) and implement a flexible strategy accordingly.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Relying solely on email for knowledge transfer may not comply with standardized processes and doesn't leverage better tools available to some team members.
  • C. Communication about importance doesn't solve the practical constraint that some team members have limited access to electronic files.
  • D. Requesting process changes before fully understanding what adaptations are possible within the current processes is premature and may not be necessary.

Question 119

A marketing team is developing ideas in order to revamp an existing product. The marketing executive reaches out to the project manager to make sure that necessary measures are in place for a successful launch.

On what should the project manager focus?

  1. Ensuring that the team is also focused on the overall change management plan
  2. Determining and aligning performance indicators that will help in assessing successful delivery
  3. Planning for regular project updates to cover the status of critical deliverables
  4. Ensuring that the scope management plan is in place to cover all related objectives
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Determining and aligning performance indicators that will help in assessing successful delivery

When launching a revamped product, the project manager must focus on establishing clear performance indicators and success criteria to measure whether the delivery meets expectations. This aligns with the marketing team's goal for a successful launch and provides objective benchmarks for evaluating project outcomes. While change management, updates, and scope planning are all important, determining and aligning performance indicators is the foundational step that defines what success looks like for all stakeholders.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Change management is important but addresses organizational adaptation rather than measuring successful delivery itself.
  • C. Status updates are operational activities that don't define what constitutes a successful launch.
  • D. Scope management ensures work boundaries but doesn't directly address how success will be measured or assessed.

Question 120

Travel restrictions are suddenly imposed during a project's execution. The team members reside in different geographic locations.

What should the project manager do next to address this issue?

  1. Obtain and implement the sponsor's recommendations for a solution.
  2. Ask the team members to proceed independently while examining needs and alternatives.
  3. Place a hold on activities until the team can resume the work on-site.
  4. Halt all processes until procurement and implementation of solutions are completed.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Ask the team members to proceed independently while examining needs and alternatives.

When suddenly facing travel restrictions with a geographically distributed team, the project manager should engage the team to examine needs and develop alternatives. This empowers the team to identify practical solutions such as remote collaboration tools, virtual meetings, or process adjustments. This collaborative approach encourages ownership and generates context-specific solutions faster than waiting for sponsor direction or halting work entirely.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Seeking sponsor recommendations first delays action when the team can immediately explore viable alternatives.
  • C. Placing a hold on activities is premature; remote work alternatives should be explored first to maintain schedule.
  • D. Halting all processes is excessive and wastes time; digital solutions can often enable continued progress without on-site presence.

Question 121

There is frequent conflict between two project team members working on a project. This has caused a negative impact on the project.

How should the project manager handle this situation?

  1. Counsel both team members and caution them with a final warning.
  2. Relocate the two project team members into different project teams.
  3. Escalate the issue to the human resources (HR) manager before a larger problem develops.
  4. Help cultivate self-awareness between the two team members through emotional intelligence (EI).
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Help cultivate self-awareness between the two team members through emotional intelligence (EI).

When team members have interpersonal conflicts, the project manager should focus on addressing the root causes and improving relationships rather than punitive or avoidance measures. Using emotional intelligence to help both team members develop self-awareness enables them to understand each other's perspectives, communicate more effectively, and resolve conflicts constructively. This approach builds team cohesion and addresses the underlying problem rather than merely separating or warning the individuals.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Issuing warnings is a punitive approach that doesn't resolve the underlying conflict and may worsen team morale.
  • B. Relocating team members avoids addressing the actual problem and doesn't develop their conflict resolution skills.
  • C. Escalating to HR prematurely bypasses the project manager's responsibility to address team dynamics and conflicts directly.

Question 122

An organization is about to start a multiphased project. Due to strict regulations, some of the phases must be completely planned in advance.

However, other phases allow for more flexibility and experimentation on scope and schedule. The sponsor wants to pursue the project objectives as planned, but also wants to accommodate new information and changes as the project progresses.

Which project management approach should the project manager select for this project?

  1. Hybrid
  2. Incremental
  3. Agile
  4. Phased
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Hybrid

A hybrid approach combines predictive and adaptive methodologies, allowing some phases to be planned upfront (meeting regulatory requirements) while other phases remain flexible and iterative (accommodating experimentation and change). This flexibility is ideal when different project phases have different constraints and requirements, enabling the organization to balance stability with adaptability.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Incremental approaches focus on delivering pieces of a product; they don't address the need for upfront planning in regulated phases.
  • C. Pure Agile methodology requires flexibility throughout and doesn't accommodate the strict advance planning needed for regulated phases.
  • D. Phased (waterfall) approaches lock in planning upfront and don't accommodate flexibility and experimentation in later phases.

Question 123

A company is changing their current business model. The change requires implementing a complex project using multiple agile teams.

What three options should the project manager have the testing team adopt as testing mechanisms? (Choose three.)

  1. Story testing
  2. Tests based on behavior and test-driven development
  3. Independent personal testing
  4. Security and performance testing
  5. An experimental approach to cover all possible choices
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A, B, D. Story testing; Tests based on behavior and test-driven development; Security and performance testing

Story testing validates that user stories meet acceptance criteria; tests based on behavior and test-driven development (TDD) ensure quality through continuous verification; security and performance testing address critical non-functional requirements essential in complex multi-team implementations. These three approaches provide comprehensive coverage for iterative testing in agile environments.

Why the other options are wrong

  • C. Independent personal testing is not a formal testing mechanism in agile frameworks and lacks structured quality assurance.
  • E. An experimental approach to cover all possible choices is not a defined testing mechanism and is too vague and inefficient.

Question 124

A project manager is working on an agile project in a changing business environment. The project sponsor is worried about benefits realization and asks the project manager to pay attention to changes that can affect the project.

Which action should the project manager take to identify changes that may affect the product?

  1. Implement face-to-face communication between the team and product owner to change the iteration objectives as needed.
  2. Stop the iteration as soon as possible in case an external change that makes the product invaluable is identified.
  3. Take action to reprioritize the backlog after every iteration to evaluate if user stories are still valuable to the business.
  4. Apply a pair programming technique to react to changes immediately, even in the middle of the interaction.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Take action to reprioritize the backlog after every iteration to evaluate if user stories are still valuable to the business.

In a changing business environment, the product manager should systematically reprioritize the backlog after each iteration to evaluate whether user stories remain valuable and aligned with current business conditions. This disciplined approach ensures the product adapts to external changes without disrupting the current iteration, while maintaining focus and continuous value delivery.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Changing iteration objectives mid-stream undermines sprint commitment and planning discipline; face-to-face communication is good but shouldn't lead to constant mid-iteration changes.
  • B. Stopping iterations whenever external changes occur is disruptive and prevents any work from being completed; agile handles change between iterations, not during them.
  • D. Pair programming is a development technique for code quality, not a change management or requirements prioritization strategy for identifying external business impacts.

Question 125

An agile project manager notices that one of the team members is developing extensive knowledge in a specific matter. Other team members are likely to require this knowledge in the future.

What should the agile project manager do?

  1. Ask the team member to develop more expertise and become a subject matter expert (SME).
  2. Ask the team member to provide a training session for the rest of the team.
  3. Ask the team member to produce a lessons learned document and share it with the team.
  4. Ask the team member to record highlights the team may want to know.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Ask the team member to provide a training session for the rest of the team.

When a team member develops specialized knowledge that others will need, the most effective approach is to ask that team member to provide a training session for the rest of the team. This directly transfers knowledge, prevents knowledge silos, and ensures the team gains capacity rather than relying on a single person. Training sessions are interactive, allow for questions, and build team capability for future work.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While developing more expertise is valuable, the immediate priority is sharing existing knowledge with the team to prevent bottlenecks.
  • C. A lessons learned document is valuable but passive; a training session ensures active engagement and understanding.
  • D. Recording highlights is less effective than direct training in ensuring the team truly understands and can apply the knowledge.

125 questions in. Want the rest? The first half of the pack, free by email · The full pack

Question 126

Important projects in the portfolio backlog need to be delivered. Budget estimates are needed to prioritize the projects.

How should the project budgets be estimated?

  1. The project is decomposed into features and based on the feature value and the velocity of the team, the team provides the estimate
  2. Budget estimates are provided based on the experience of the sponsor, product owner and team facilitator
  3. The team facilitator uses historical data and arrives at an estimate based on the nature of the project.
  4. The product owner obtains all project details and based on the team's experience and velocity provides a budget estimate
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. The project is decomposed into features and based on the feature value and the velocity of the team, the team provides the estimate

In agile environments, budget estimation for portfolio prioritization should decompose the project into features and use team velocity combined with feature value to arrive at estimates (A). This approach is grounded in actual team capacity and delivery rates, making it more reliable for portfolio-level decisions. Option B relies on subjective experience without data-driven rigor. Option C uses historical data but doesn't incorporate velocity or current team capacity. Option D improperly positions the product owner as the primary estimator rather than the team itself.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Experience-based estimates without velocity or historical data lack the rigor needed for portfolio prioritization.
  • C. While historical data is useful, this approach doesn't incorporate velocity metrics or feature decomposition necessary for agile estimation.
  • D. The product owner should not be the primary estimator; the development team provides estimates based on their velocity.

Question 127

A project team is using one of the visual management tools to identify dependencies. It was identified that domain knowledge from one team needs to be shared with another team to ensure the continuity of deliverables.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Remove the dependency to eliminate the need for knowledge sharing.
  2. Redistribute the team members so knowledge is available in both teams.
  3. Merge both teams into one team so the knowledge is commonly available.
  4. Request the respective teams to plan for knowledge-sharing sessions.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Request the respective teams to plan for knowledge-sharing sessions.

When a dependency is identified that requires knowledge sharing between teams, the appropriate solution is to plan and facilitate knowledge-sharing sessions. This preserves team structure and autonomy while ensuring continuity. Planning sessions allows teams to transfer domain expertise efficiently without disrupting team composition or merging independent teams.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Dependencies often cannot or should not be removed; they reflect real technical or functional relationships.
  • B. Redistributing team members creates instability and loses the benefits of established team cohesion.
  • C. Merging teams is an extreme solution that eliminates team separation and may reduce organizational flexibility.

Question 128

In the daily check-in meeting, a team member informs the project team that the licenses for one of the components that will be used will expire in a couple of months. The licensing cost is significant.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Evaluate the impact of nonrenewal of the license.
  2. Escalate the licensing issue to the product owner.
  3. Add a spike to the backlog for an alternative design.
  4. Raise a change request to secure the renewal.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Evaluate the impact of nonrenewal of the license.

When a licensing issue is raised that will expire in a couple of months with significant cost implications, the first step is to evaluate the impact of not renewing the license. This analysis determines whether renewal is necessary, if alternatives exist, what the actual business impact would be, and informs all subsequent decisions. Impact assessment precedes escalation, change requests, or architectural changes.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Escalating to the product owner before understanding the impact wastes their time and provides insufficient information for decision-making.
  • C. Adding a spike for an alternative design before evaluating whether renewal is necessary or feasible is premature and potentially wasteful.
  • D. Raising a change request assumes renewal is necessary and should happen, but the first step should be evaluating whether that's even required.

Question 129

During daily team standup meetings, team members constantly ask about which tasks they should focus on first.

How should the project manager ensure the team is fully productive?

  1. Review the project backlog during the team's standup meeting.
  2. Encourage project team members to prioritize the product backlog.
  3. Ensure team members are working according to the project plan.
  4. Work with the product owner to ensure the project backlog is prioritized.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Work with the product owner to ensure the project backlog is prioritized.

When team members constantly ask about task prioritization during standups, the solution is to work with the product owner to ensure the product backlog is properly prioritized. The product owner owns prioritization decisions, and the team should be able to reference a clear, prioritized backlog to determine what to work on. This addresses the root cause rather than treating symptoms and ensures prioritization authority rests with the appropriate role.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Reviewing the backlog during standups consumes time meant for status updates and is inefficient; prioritization should be done beforehand.
  • B. While encouraging self-prioritization has merit, the product owner is accountable for backlog prioritization in agile frameworks.
  • C. Ensuring work according to the project plan is too waterfall-oriented; agile projects rely on the prioritized backlog as the primary work guide.

Question 130

A project manager is part of a balanced matrix project organization. The project manager will receive all work performance updates directly from the new sourcing department head who has no time to spare to give the project manager the information.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Discuss the situation with the company project sponsor for advice
  2. Request information directly from the sourcing department team members
  3. Work out a resolution in consultation with the sourcing department head
  4. Present the situation to the manager of the sourcing department head
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Work out a resolution in consultation with the sourcing department head

In a balanced matrix environment, the project manager and functional manager share responsibility for resource performance. Rather than circumventing the sourcing department head or escalating immediately, the project manager should first work collaboratively with the department head to establish a workable communication mechanism that respects their constraints while meeting the project's information needs. This preserves the working relationship and solves the problem at the appropriate level.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Going directly to the sponsor before attempting resolution with the functional manager is premature escalation and does not respect the matrix governance structure.
  • B. Requesting information directly from team members bypasses the department head's authority and undermines the matrix structure, which relies on clear reporting lines.
  • D. Presenting the situation to the sourcing department head's manager escalates unnecessarily before collaborative problem-solving with the head has been attempted.

Question 131

A project manager is leading a hybrid project funded by a time and materials (T&M) agreement. The project was completed, and the client accepted the delivery of the product. One week later, the client asked the project manager to fix two defects they found in the product. The project manager responded with an estimate of time and money and asked the client to confirm this. The client disagreed and insisted that the work should be done for free because it is a defect in the product.

What should the project manager have done to prevent this?

  1. Trained client engineers to support the product after its delivery.
  2. Reviewed the project quality control plan with the client.
  3. Suggested a fixed-cost basis and included free bug fixes for 1 month.
  4. Planned how the delivered product will be supported after its delivery.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Planned how the delivered product will be supported after its delivery.

The conflict arose because post-delivery support expectations were not clearly established. By planning how the delivered product will be supported after delivery, including defining what constitutes a defect versus an enhancement, warranty period, and maintenance terms, the project manager could have prevented the disagreement. This planning should occur during project planning, not after delivery. Clear support agreements ensure both parties understand their responsibilities and costs after handoff.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Training client engineers is helpful for product adoption but doesn't address the contractual clarity needed to prevent disputes over defect responsibility.
  • B. Reviewing quality control during the project doesn't address post-delivery support expectations and cost allocation.
  • C. While fixed-cost with free bug fixes might help, the real issue is the lack of any pre-agreed support plan; this is reactive rather than preventive.

Question 132

The project manager has observed that two team members have been arguing with each other openly at meetings. To push their ideas through, each team member individually spoke with the sponsor directly and made decisions without informing the project manager or other team members.

What two actions should project manager take? (Choose two.)

  1. Ask the team members to work it out themselves
  2. Discuss this situation with other project managers and ask for advice
  3. Reiterate ground rules at the next meeting and ensure that all team members are clear about these rules
  4. Address the behavioral issue with each team member
  5. Discuss the behavior directly with their managers and request them to correct the behavior
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C, D. Reiterate ground rules at the next meeting and ensure that all team members are clear about these rules; Address the behavioral issue with each team member

When team members are arguing openly and making unauthorized decisions with the sponsor, the project manager must address both the behavioral issue directly with each individual team member (D) and establish clear ground rules for all team members (C). Direct behavioral feedback and clear communication protocols prevent future conflicts and ensure proper decision-making channels. Asking team members to resolve it themselves (A) abdicates responsibility, seeking peer advice (B) delays action, and involving external managers (E) bypasses the project manager's direct authority and accountability.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Avoiding direct intervention allows the conflict to escalate and undermines project governance.
  • B. Consulting other project managers delays addressing the immediate behavioral and governance issues.
  • E. Escalating to functional managers circumvents the project manager's responsibility and may damage team dynamics unnecessarily.

Question 133

A project manager is working for an organization in country A and has been tasked with opening the first brick-and-mortar store in country B. The sponsor has identified the city for the store and wants to minimize any potential issues with the local government.

Which action should the project manager take to address the sponsor's request?

  1. Work with the organization's legal department to identify local regulations to ensure project compliance
  2. Work with the organization's project management office (PMO) to build a project team of residents located in the city
  3. Work with the organization's real estate department and reach out to the local government to identify the best location for the store
  4. Work with the local government to build the profiles of employees that will be working in the store
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Work with the organization's legal department to identify local regulations to ensure project compliance

To minimize issues with local government when establishing operations in a new country, the project manager must first understand what regulations and compliance requirements exist. Working with the legal department to identify local regulations ensures the project operates within the legal framework and avoids costly violations or delays. This proactive compliance approach directly addresses the sponsor's concern about potential issues with local government. All other options focus on execution steps that should follow, not the foundational legal due diligence needed first.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Building a team from local residents is useful for execution but doesn't address the critical need to identify and comply with local regulations.
  • C. While real estate and location selection are important, they cannot properly proceed without first understanding the legal and regulatory requirements.
  • D. Employee profiling is an HR function that comes much later in the project and doesn't address the sponsor's concern about government relations.

Question 134

A company has appointed a supplier to deliver software and has assigned an internal project manager. The supplier states that no technical development or testing is required from the customer. The project manager would like to confirm this with all of the stakeholders.

What should the internal project manager do first?

  1. Host an alignment session with stakeholders to formalize the project requirements.
  2. Develop a user acceptance testing plan to ensure the quality of the deliverables.
  3. Communicate to the supplier that customer testing is required.
  4. Distribute the project plan to all of the interested parties.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Host an alignment session with stakeholders to formalize the project requirements.

When there is a discrepancy between the supplier's statement and typical project requirements (that customer testing is not needed), the project manager must first hold an alignment session with all stakeholders to formalize and confirm project requirements. This ensures consensus on the scope of work, roles, and responsibilities before proceeding, preventing misunderstandings and disputes later in the project.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Developing a UAT plan assumes customer testing will occur, which bypasses the need to first confirm requirements with stakeholders.
  • C. Unilaterally communicating that customer testing is required may not be accurate and skips the necessary stakeholder alignment step.
  • D. Distributing the project plan without first confirming requirements with stakeholders leaves ambiguity about testing responsibilities unresolved.

Question 135

An organization is transitioning to agile and a project has been chosen as a pilot. The assigned project manager only has experience using predictive approaches, but the project manager is now required to use agile approaches with the help of an agile coach. During the retrospective of the fifth sprint, the project team complains that many obstacles exist with the organization that are creating project delays and rework.

What should the project manager do in this situation?

  1. Include impediment resolutions during daily standup meetings
  2. Perform a root cause analysis during the standup meetings
  3. Create a dedicated sprint to solve the obstacles with the team
  4. Promote collaboration to help remove the obstacles for the team
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Promote collaboration to help remove the obstacles for the team

In agile retrospectives, when the team identifies organizational obstacles causing delays and rework, the project manager (with agile coach support) should promote collaboration to help remove obstacles (D). This empowers the team to collectively problem-solve and work around or eliminate systemic barriers, which is a core agile principle. Option A limits discussion to daily standups without tackling root causes. Option B performs analysis but doesn't resolve the obstacles. Option C creates a sprint to fix organizational problems, which misuses sprints and doesn't address systemic issues. Promoting collaboration activates the team's collective problem-solving ability.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Discussing impediments in standups is necessary but insufficient without action to remove organizational barriers.
  • B. Root cause analysis during standups is time-inefficient and doesn't produce solutions to organizational obstacles.
  • C. A dedicated sprint to fix organizational issues misuses sprint capacity and treats symptoms rather than removing barriers systemically.

Question 136

A project manager is beginning a new project with very diverse team members. The project manager chose to use consensus building so the team can agree on and be engaged in how the project will be executed.

How should the project manager proceed?

  1. Create an environment where the agreement is reached by a majority vote
  2. Create an environment where the agreement is reached through discussion
  3. Establish recurring brainstorming sessions to discuss project issues
  4. Allow team members to contribute ideas in a stream-of-consciousness mode
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Create an environment where the agreement is reached through discussion

Consensus building requires open dialogue and discussion where all team members can express their views and work toward mutual agreement. This approach fosters engagement and buy-in from diverse team members by ensuring their voices are heard and considered in decision-making, rather than simply imposing decisions through voting or unstructured brainstorming.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Majority vote is a democratic process but does not constitute true consensus, as it can leave minority voices unheard and disengaged.
  • C. While brainstorming sessions may support consensus, they are a tool rather than the core process; consensus is achieved through discussion.
  • D. Stream-of-consciousness contribution lacks the structured dialogue necessary for reaching genuine consensus and agreement.

Question 137

A project manager who is managing a critical project in a multinational company is conducting a progress meeting with all team members. During the meeting, one of the team members states that they are facing a critical problem that will prevent them from completing their assigned task.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Ask the team member to follow the approved communications management plan to communicate their issue
  2. Schedule a meeting with the concerned team member to review and update the issue log together
  3. Review the risk register with the team member to find the proper response action for this issue
  4. Ask the team member to raise a change request to assess the issue in detail
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Schedule a meeting with the concerned team member to review and update the issue log together

When a team member raises a critical blocking issue during a meeting, the project manager should schedule a dedicated meeting with that team member to review and update the Issue Log together (B). This provides focused attention, documents the issue formally, and ensures proper tracking and resolution planning. Following the communications management plan (A) is procedurally correct but misses the immediate action needed. The risk register (C) tracks risks, not active blocking issues. A change request (D) is for scope changes, not problem resolution during execution.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While communication protocols matter, immediately following process without addressing the critical blocker delays resolution.
  • C. The risk register tracks potential future problems; this is a current active issue requiring the issue log.
  • D. A change request is for scope modifications; this is an execution problem requiring issue resolution, not change control.

Question 138

A project manager has been managing a project for several months when an issue that had not been registered as a risk appeared. This issue may have a big impact on the project.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Avoid managing the issue as it was not registered as a risk for the project and there is no planned response to it.
  2. Hold a meeting with the project team and relevant stakeholders to agree on the best way to manage the issue.
  3. Delay the project until the issue is addressed and no longer presents as a risk to the project.
  4. Inform the sponsor that the issue has arisen and that the project's success may be uncertain.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Hold a meeting with the project team and relevant stakeholders to agree on the best way to manage the issue.

When an unanticipated issue with significant impact appears, the project manager should immediately convene the relevant stakeholders and team members to assess the situation, understand its implications, and collaboratively agree on a management strategy. This transparent, inclusive approach ensures shared ownership of the problem and increases the likelihood of an effective solution.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Ignoring an issue with potential major impact simply because it wasn't previously registered as a risk is irresponsible and violates basic project management principles.
  • C. Delaying the entire project is an extreme response before the issue is even fully understood or assessed for actual impact.
  • D. Informing the sponsor without first understanding the issue and developing response options provides incomplete information and creates unnecessary alarm.

Question 139

Close to the end of a project, a customer claims that some deliverables have not been met and starts initiating change requests.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Refer to the requirements traceability matrix.
  2. Escalate the change request to the project sponsor.
  3. Revise the project scope baseline.
  4. Review the approved project charter.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Refer to the requirements traceability matrix.

When a customer claims deliverables have not been met, the first step is to refer to the requirements traceability matrix (RTM), which documents all requirements and traces them to specific deliverables. This provides objective evidence of what was agreed upon and which deliverables address those requirements, allowing the project manager to clarify whether the claim is valid or based on misunderstanding.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Escalating before investigating and verifying the claim bypasses due diligence and may not be warranted.
  • C. The scope baseline should not be revised until it is confirmed that actual scope gaps exist.
  • D. The project charter provides high-level information but the RTM is the specific tool for tracing requirements to deliverables.

Question 140

A project manager is leading a multiyear project that involves internal and external stakeholders. As the project manager begins to gather requirements, additional business stakeholders express interest in being involved.

Which three actions should the project manager take to ensure proper stakeholder involvement? (Choose three.)

  1. Prioritize stakeholders based on the project phase and need
  2. Perform a stakeholder assessment to align with the project objectives
  3. Classify and rank stakeholders based on their positions in the organization
  4. Include all stakeholders in the stakeholder engagement plan and provide the same level of communication
  5. Develop a stakeholder impact/influence matrix to determine the level of engagement
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A, B, E. Prioritize stakeholders based on the project phase and need; Perform a stakeholder assessment to align with the project objectives; Develop a stakeholder impact/influence matrix to determine the level of engagement

Option A ensures resources are allocated efficiently based on each phase's actual needs. Option B aligns stakeholder involvement with project objectives rather than organizational position. Option E provides a structured tool to assess influence and impact, enabling appropriate engagement levels for different stakeholders. Together these create a rational, objective stakeholder strategy.

Why the other options are wrong

  • C. Classifying solely by organizational position ignores actual project influence and creates unnecessary engagement overhead with low-impact stakeholders.
  • D. Providing the same communication level to all stakeholders is inefficient and contradicts stakeholder management best practices of differentiated engagement.

Question 141

A state-of-the-art product was delivered at the end of a project life cycle. However, the customer claims the product was not designed to specifications.

What should the project manager have done to avoid this issue?

  1. The customer's requirements should have been captured and modified to meet the supplier's standards.
  2. The iteration review planning meeting should have been planned accordingly.
  3. The customer's requirements should have been captured in order to meet the customer's standards.
  4. The sprint retrospective meeting should have included necessary stakeholders.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. The customer's requirements should have been captured in order to meet the customer's standards.

The fundamental issue was that customer requirements were not properly captured and documented to ensure the product met the customer's standards and expectations. The product may be state-of-the-art from a technical perspective, but it failed to meet specifications because the requirements process didn't adequately capture what the customer actually needed. Proper requirements management at the outset would have prevented this mismatch between product and customer expectations.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Requirements should never be modified to meet supplier standards; they should define what the supplier must deliver.
  • B. Iteration review meetings address ongoing delivery; the problem originated in initial requirements, not execution tracking.
  • D. Sprint retrospectives are post-iteration process improvements; they don't prevent initial requirements misalignment.

Question 142

A project manager is struggling to figure out the performance of the project teams in an agile environment. For the same scope of work, team A has calculated 100 story points and team B has calculated 125 story points.

Which team is performing better?

  1. Team A as they have calculated fewer story points than team B
  2. Team B as they have calculated more story points than team A
  3. The team that completes the most stones selected from the sprint backlog
  4. The team with the least amount of defects in their deliverables
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. The team that completes the most stones selected from the sprint backlog

Story points are relative estimates specific to a team and cannot be compared across teams meaningfully. Different teams estimate the same work differently based on their context and experience. The only valid comparison of team performance is the actual work completed, the number of stories they finish from the sprint backlog. This velocity metric shows real productivity and delivery capability.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Fewer story points does not indicate better performance; teams estimate differently and story points are not comparable across teams.
  • B. More story points does not indicate better performance; teams may simply estimate more generously or differently.
  • D. While defect quality is important, it measures quality not performance; both quality and completion rate should be considered together.

Question 143

A project manager is leading a large-scale project that involves 70 stakeholders. The project manager has heard various comments and expectations from the customers, some of which are contradictory. Consequently, some requirements are not clear.

What should the project manager do to build consensus regarding the requirements?

  1. Escalate the issue to the management team for their review and guidance
  2. Create a survey template to collect feedback from stakeholders to reach an agreement
  3. Organize a face-to-face meeting with all stakeholders to understand their interests and concerns
  4. Leverage expert judgment to determine the requirements that should be considered
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Organize a face-to-face meeting with all stakeholders to understand their interests and concerns

Organizing face-to-face meetings with stakeholders is the most effective approach for understanding diverse interests, clarifying contradictory expectations, and building consensus on requirements. Direct dialogue allows the project manager to explore underlying concerns, identify common ground, and facilitate collaborative problem-solving. With 70 stakeholders, this may require multiple sessions, but direct engagement is essential for resolving fundamental requirement conflicts.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Escalating to management abdicates the project manager's responsibility to facilitate stakeholder alignment on requirements.
  • B. Surveys are useful for gathering data but don't facilitate the dialogue needed to resolve contradictions and build consensus.
  • D. Relying solely on expert judgment ignores stakeholder input and fails to address the contradictory expectations that are the real problem.

Question 144

A project manager is leading a product feature rollout that will gain more subscribers for a video-streaming application. During the backlog grooming phase. the business stakeholders were unable to understand the feature integration with the product and raised concerns.

What can the project manager do to demonstrate the feature integration?

  1. Include the business stakeholders in the iteration review.
  2. Involve business stakeholders in the iteration retrospective.
  3. Create a task for the iteration review and add it to the backlog.
  4. Review the backlog in detail with the business stakeholders.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Include the business stakeholders in the iteration review.

The iteration review is the appropriate forum to demonstrate completed work and feature integration to business stakeholders. During the iteration review, the team showcases working software and gathers feedback from stakeholders, which directly addresses stakeholder concerns about feature integration that arose during backlog grooming. This is the proper agile ceremony for demonstrating tangible product increments.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Retrospectives focus on process improvement and team dynamics, not product demonstration or feature validation.
  • C. Adding a task to the backlog doesn't demonstrate the feature integration; the feature itself needs to be shown during review ceremonies.
  • D. Further backlog detail review alone won't demonstrate integration; stakeholders need to see the working feature.

Question 145

A project manager is managing an internal project that was poorly defined. Recently, the project manager received several change requests raised by the organization's upper management.

What should the project manager do first?

  1. Assess the time overrun, and start implementation to avoid additional delays
  2. Motivate the team to avoid the frustration of working on a prolonged project
  3. Request a provisional budget increase to avoid any budget overruns
  4. Review the benefits of the proposed changes in relation to the business case
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Review the benefits of the proposed changes in relation to the business case

Before taking any action on change requests, the project manager must first review whether the proposed changes align with the business case and deliver business value. This evaluation determines if changes should be accepted, rejected, or prioritized based on organizational strategy. Assessing impact on the business case is the essential first step before committing time, budget, or team resources.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Immediately implementing changes without evaluation wastes effort and budget if the changes don't align with business objectives.
  • B. Motivating the team is important but doesn't address the fundamental need to evaluate whether change requests should be approved.
  • C. Requesting budget increases is premature before understanding if changes align with business value and should be accepted at all.

Question 146

Early in the execution phase, a project manager discovers that recent changes in enterprise environmental factors (EEFs) will severely reduce the implementation cost and shorten the project schedule.

How should the project manager address this situation?

  1. Meet with the project team to decide how the remaining budget will be spent
  2. Keep the extra budget as management reserve until project closeout
  3. Give the team extra time to finish tasks within the original timeline
  4. Follow the project escalation policy and communications management plan
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Follow the project escalation policy and communications management plan

When enterprise environmental factors create significant schedule and cost improvements, the project manager must follow established escalation policies and communications management plan procedures. This ensures changes are properly documented, stakeholders are informed, and decisions are made through appropriate governance channels rather than ad-hoc team decisions.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. The team shouldn't unilaterally decide how to spend remaining budget; this bypasses stakeholder input and governance controls.
  • B. Keeping extra budget as reserve without involving stakeholders and following change procedures violates transparency and governance requirements.
  • C. Giving extra time contradicts the benefit of shortened schedules and doesn't address how to properly communicate and manage this favorable change.

Question 147

A company routinely outsources resources for specific core activities. Due to a sudden, unforeseen risk, all of the team members are needed to work remotely, including the outsourced ones.

How can the project manager address this challenge to assure outsourced vendors deliver?

  1. Develop a new strategy for communication and management of resources.
  2. Review the risk management plan for the mitigation activities.
  3. Review the coordination and communication costs with the supplier.
  4. Submit a change request to increase the contingency budget.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Develop a new strategy for communication and management of resources.

When an unforeseen risk forces a sudden shift to remote work for outsourced resources, the project manager must develop a new strategy addressing communication protocols, management approaches, and oversight mechanisms specific to remote vendor coordination. This proactive approach ensures vendors remain accountable and delivery standards are maintained under the new operating conditions.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Reviewing the risk management plan is reactive; the risk has already materialized and requires immediate operational response.
  • C. Reviewing coordination costs doesn't address the delivery assurance problem or the communication challenges of remote work.
  • D. Increasing contingency budget is financial in nature and doesn't solve the operational challenge of managing remote outsourced resources.

Question 148

A project manager just started managing agile projects. The project manager realizes that due to the lack of a clear definition of project objectives and definition of done (DoD), their colleague's projects have had many difficulties. Sponsors keep asking for more features and the projects have yet to be completed.

What should the project manager do to avoid these issues?

  1. Arrange meetings to ensure every necessary task to complete the project is included in the project management plan
  2. Convince the project sponsor to incorporate quality experts so the product can be tested and accepted as completed
  3. Convince the product owner to approach the team and look for options to find a solution to the problem
  4. Schedule meetings with key stakeholders to build the agile project charter and set clear expectations for the project
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Schedule meetings with key stakeholders to build the agile project charter and set clear expectations for the project

The root cause of the problems described, unclear objectives, undefined 'definition of done', uncontrolled scope creep, and incomplete projects, stems from the lack of a clear agile project charter and stakeholder alignment. Scheduling meetings with key stakeholders to establish the agile project charter, product vision, and clear expectations is the foundational step that prevents these issues before they occur.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Including all tasks in the project management plan is a traditional approach that conflicts with agile principles and doesn't address the core issue of unclear objectives.
  • B. Adding quality experts does not address the fundamental problem of missing project objectives and definition of done.
  • C. The product owner involvement is important, but the initial problem requires stakeholder alignment on the charter and expectations, not just finding solutions to existing problems.

Question 149

A project manager is working on a unique project that is dissimilar to the project nature of the organization. The project manager is tailoring the artifacts for this new project.

Who should determine which artifacts should be used in the project?

  1. The project stakeholders should meet and determine the project artifacts to be used by the project manager and the project management team.
  2. The project manager and project management team should use the standard project artifacts from the database.
  3. The project sponsor should select the project artifacts that the project manager and project management team should use in the project.
  4. The project manager and the project management team should select the appropriate artifacts for use in the specific project.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. The project manager and the project management team should select the appropriate artifacts for use in the specific project.

The project manager and project management team are responsible for tailoring project artifacts to fit the unique nature of the project. Since this project is dissimilar to the organization's standard projects, standard artifacts from a database would be inappropriate. The team closest to the project work must determine which artifacts are suitable for this specific project's characteristics and constraints.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While stakeholder input may be valuable, the primary responsibility for selecting appropriate artifacts belongs to the project management team, not a committee of stakeholders.
  • B. Using standard artifacts from a database would be inappropriate for a unique project that differs significantly from the organization's typical project nature.
  • C. The sponsor's role is oversight and strategic alignment, not selecting the detailed project management artifacts that the team will use operationally.

Question 150

A project manager entered into a contract with a vendor to build a new system. During the acceptance test stage, the project manager noticed that the system quality was not satisfactory.

How should the project manager support their claim to the vendor?

  1. Provide the failed test results along with the agreed-upon acceptance criteria.
  2. Share unsuccessful results from previous projects with a similar scope.
  3. Document in the risk log that the issues in the system were already identified.
  4. Show that the acceptance criteria were changed by the vendor without approval.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Provide the failed test results along with the agreed-upon acceptance criteria.

To support a claim of unsatisfactory system quality to a vendor, the project manager needs concrete evidence: the failed test results demonstrating specific deficiencies paired with the agreed-upon acceptance criteria that the system failed to meet (option A). This contractual documentation provides objective proof and establishes the basis for remediation demands or contractual disputes.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Results from previous projects are not relevant to the current contract and may not be admissible in disputes over this specific deliverable.
  • C. Documenting issues in a risk log after acceptance testing is too late and does not address whether acceptance criteria were met.
  • D. Changes to acceptance criteria should be documented in change orders; showing criterion changes without approval is a separate issue from current quality deficiency.

150 questions in. Want the rest? The first half of the pack, free by email · The full pack

Question 151

The marketing team is transitioning to using hybrid approaches for their projects. The marketing director is not knowledgeable about hybrid methodologies, and the project manager needs the director's support as the marketing director is a key stakeholder.

What should the project manager do to obtain the support?

  1. Train the marketing team and keep the director informed.
  2. Mentor the marketing director on hybrid approaches.
  3. Ask the marketing team members to coach the director.
  4. Ask the marketing director to participate in daily meetings.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Mentor the marketing director on hybrid approaches.

To gain support from a key stakeholder who lacks knowledge of hybrid methodologies, the project manager should directly mentor the director. This one-on-one approach builds the director's understanding and confidence in the hybrid approach, creating an informed advocate rather than a skeptical bloccker. Direct mentorship from the project manager is more effective for executive-level stakeholders than team-based coaching.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Training the team without addressing the director's knowledge gap won't secure the director's informed support.
  • C. Having team members coach the director is less appropriate for executive stakeholder engagement and professional relationships.
  • D. Asking the director to participate in daily meetings without foundational knowledge creates frustration rather than support.

Question 152

A company starts implementing Scrum. About halfway through the first sprint, communication issues develop. Some project team members are not in sync with other team members.

What is the cause for this communication gap?

  1. The project sprint board has not been updated
  2. Daily standup meetings were not held or enforced
  3. The project status dashboard has not been updated
  4. The communications management plan has not been developed
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Daily standup meetings were not held or enforced

Daily standup meetings are the primary communication mechanism in Scrum to keep team members synchronized. If these meetings are not held or enforced, team members lack visibility into what others are working on, leading directly to communication gaps and misalignment. This is a fundamental Scrum practice that ensures everyone stays in sync during sprint execution.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. While an updated sprint board helps visibility, the board is a tool; the daily standup is the active communication mechanism that prevents gaps.
  • C. A status dashboard is a reporting tool and would not prevent communication gaps between team members during active development.
  • D. A communications management plan is important but is a planning artifact; the absence of daily standups is the operational cause of the communication gap.

Question 153

As a member of an organizational change management team, a project manager must pass on any changes to the project team. The project manager needs to avoid any misunderstandings or resistance to help ensure that the project team will support any organizational change.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Conduct meetings with resistant members to facilitate smooth project implementation
  2. Meet with the team on a regular basis to ensure they are aware of changes
  3. Influence the team to communicate any changes
  4. Check with the team members on their willingness to change
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Meet with the team on a regular basis to ensure they are aware of changes

To avoid misunderstandings and resistance when implementing organizational changes, the project manager should meet with the team on a regular basis to ensure they are aware of and understand changes as they occur. Regular, consistent communication creates transparency and allows the team to adjust expectations and prepare for changes, reducing resistance and supporting adoption.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Conducting meetings only with resistant members is reactive and may not address the broader team's need for consistent information.
  • C. Influencing the team to communicate changes is indirect; the project manager should directly communicate changes to the team.
  • D. Checking willingness to change is important but comes after ensuring awareness; communication must precede buy-in discussions.

Question 154

A company's project management office (PMO) has been trying to implement an adaptive approach in the project management framework and a project manager has been asked to use adaptive tools in their next project. This is not the first time the request has been made and the previous project failed when adaptive tools were implemented.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Prepare a change request and seek approval from the steering committee regarding the new project framework
  2. Conduct individual interviews with key stakeholders in order to understand all concerns, then prepare a communications management plan
  3. Bring in a third party company to develop and implement a hybrid framework for this specific project
  4. Recommend to the PMO that it is not the right time to start implementing adaptive tools in projects
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Conduct individual interviews with key stakeholders in order to understand all concerns, then prepare a communications management plan

Since previous adaptive implementation failed, the project manager should first understand stakeholder concerns through individual interviews rather than immediately seeking external solutions or change approvals. Understanding the root causes of the previous failure through stakeholder feedback and concerns is essential before developing a communications plan to address these issues. This diagnostic approach prevents repeating past mistakes.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Seeking approval for a framework change without first understanding why the previous implementation failed is premature.
  • C. Bringing in a third party to develop a hybrid framework bypasses the critical step of understanding what went wrong and why stakeholders are resistant.
  • D. Recommending against adaptive tools avoids the real issue, understanding and addressing stakeholder concerns about implementation.

Question 155

A client wants to create an innovative software for the travel industry using an agile approach. A project manager from the company was assigned to work on the details and estimates as requested by the client.

What should the project manager do before sending the information to the client?

  1. Put the tasks with estimates in the backlog and clarify that the project will not need any reserves.
  2. Sequence the tasks with estimates and add standard risk reserves to use for software development.
  3. Analyze the tasks, provide estimates, include a prototype demo, and send to the client directly.
  4. Work with the team to understand their views and add the appropriate dependencies and risks.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Work with the team to understand their views and add the appropriate dependencies and risks.

Before sending estimates to the client, the project manager should work with the team to understand their perspectives, validate the estimates, and identify dependencies and risks. This collaborative approach ensures the estimates are realistic, the team is aligned, and potential challenges are surfaced early. Working with the team strengthens buy-in and helps prevent scope and schedule issues. This is essential in agile where team input is critical for accurate planning.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Stating that no reserves are needed is unrealistic and risky for any software project.
  • B. While sequencing is useful, this doesn't address team input and understanding which is critical before finalizing estimates.
  • C. Sending information directly to the client without team collaboration and a prototype demo is premature and misses opportunity for team validation.

Question 156

An organization is transitioning from a predictive to an agile approach.

What should the project manager do to ensure that the agile approaches will bring about significant change?

  1. Obtain full management support
  2. Identify the organization's key clients
  3. Learn as much as possible about the organization
  4. Conduct agile training for the team members
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Obtain full management support

For significant organizational transformation from predictive to agile approaches, full management support is essential. Without executive backing, resistance to change will undermine adoption, resource allocation, and sustainability. Management support enables policy changes, removes organizational barriers, and legitimizes the new approach across the organization.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Identifying key clients is a stakeholder activity but doesn't directly ensure successful transformation.
  • C. Learning about the organization is useful context but doesn't drive the change itself.
  • D. Training team members is important but insufficient without management buy-in to support systemic change.

Question 157

A project manager is working on a software development project for an oil and gas client using an agile approach. The project manager is having difficulty preparing the schedule because the project has various unknowns.

Which scheduling method should the project manager use to develop the schedule?

  1. Analogous scheduling
  2. Three-point scheduling
  3. Iterative scheduling
  4. Parametric scheduling
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Iterative scheduling

Iterative scheduling is the appropriate method for agile projects with unknowns. It allows the schedule to be developed and refined incrementally throughout the project as more information becomes available, rather than requiring a fully detailed plan upfront. This approach aligns with agile principles and accommodates the uncertainties inherent in software development.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Analogous scheduling relies on historical data from similar projects and doesn't address unknowns specific to this project.
  • B. Three-point scheduling (PERT) estimates duration uncertainty but still requires work breakdown; it's not the primary agile scheduling approach.
  • D. Parametric scheduling uses statistical relationships and algorithms, which require defined parameters not available when facing significant unknowns.

Question 158

A project team is conducting sprint planning. At the end of the sprint, the product increment must be deployed on a customer's site. The product owner received an email from the account manager that the customer may not be ready to install the new version of the product.

What should the project manager do?

  1. Ask the sales team to inform the customer.
  2. Contact the customer's project manager.
  3. Ask the product owner to inform the customer.
  4. Contact the customer's technical lead.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Contact the customer's project manager.

The customer's project manager is the appropriate point of contact for deployment readiness issues, as they manage the customer's implementation side and can coordinate internal readiness. They represent the customer's project governance and are responsible for ensuring their organization is prepared for the deployment, making them the logical contact for addressing installation readiness concerns.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. The sales team is not responsible for managing technical deployment readiness and lacks the authority to address installation concerns.
  • C. While the product owner can be informed, they are not the appropriate first contact for customer-side deployment readiness issues.
  • D. The technical lead is typically a subordinate resource; escalation should go to the customer's project manager for coordination and decision-making.

Question 159

Midway through the execution of an agile protect there is a shift in the strategic objectives at the organization level to promote digital transformation.

What should the project manager do next?

  1. Schedule a meeting with the team to assess the impact of the change
  2. Escalate to the product owner and cancel the upcoming iterations
  3. Prepare a user story to handle the change and assign it to the next iteration
  4. Update the risk-prioritized backlog with the strategic change
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Schedule a meeting with the team to assess the impact of the change

When strategic objectives shift mid-project, the project manager should first schedule a meeting with the team to assess the impact of the change. This allows the team to understand how the digital transformation objective affects current work, dependencies, and deliverables. Impact assessment is a prerequisite for any subsequent decisions about backlog adjustments or iteration changes.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Escalating and canceling iterations prematurely bypasses impact assessment and team input, which could lead to poor decisions.
  • C. Creating a user story before assessing impact on existing work may result in scope creep or conflicts with current iteration commitments.
  • D. Updating the backlog without first understanding the change's implications and team capacity is premature and could misalign priorities.

Question 160

A company has started developing a new product. During execution the project team notices that another competitor has launched a product with very similar functionalities and a cheaper market price.

What should have been done differently to avoid this scenario?

  1. A minimum viable product (MVP) should have been released to get feedback from the market.
  2. More backlog refinement meetings should have been scheduled.
  3. The Kanban method should have been utilized to optimize the work in progress (WIP).
  4. An iterative life cycle approach should have been adopted.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. A minimum viable product (MVP) should have been released to get feedback from the market.

A minimum viable product (MVP) approach enables early market entry, rapid feedback collection, and course correction before competitors launch. By releasing early with core functionality, the team could have validated market needs, gathered user feedback, and adjusted the product strategy before investing in full development. This is a key advantage of iterative and agile approaches for competitive environments.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. More backlog refinement meetings don't address the fundamental issue of slow time-to-market in a competitive landscape.
  • C. Kanban optimization improves execution efficiency but doesn't solve late market entry or the need for early feedback.
  • D. While iterative approaches are helpful, the specific practice of releasing an MVP is the most direct prevention mechanism.

Question 161

Midway through a two-year hybrid project to deliver a ticketing platform, the project manager learns that the external client has been unhappy with recent deliveries for over a month. Complaints reach the project manager only through the company's account manager. After resolving the current complaints, the project manager wants to stop this from happening again. What should the project manager do?

  1. Set up regular direct satisfaction checks with the client at each delivery and act on what they reveal.
  2. Ask the account manager to forward the client's complaints more quickly from now on.
  3. Wait for the client satisfaction survey planned at final acceptance to measure the problem properly.
  4. Escalate the client's complaints to the sponsor and ask the sponsor to manage the client relationship.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Set up regular direct satisfaction checks with the client at each delivery and act on what they reveal.

Monitoring customer satisfaction is an ongoing duty, not something left to the end of a project or relayed secondhand. Because complaints reached the project manager only through the account manager, dissatisfaction went unaddressed for over a month. Building a short, direct satisfaction check into each delivery, such as a review conversation or a brief survey with the client, gives early warning of changing expectations, and acting on the results keeps outcomes aligned with what the client expects.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Faster forwarding still depends on a secondhand channel and only reacts after the client is already unhappy.
  • C. Measuring satisfaction only at final acceptance would let problems grow for the rest of the two-year project.
  • D. Managing client expectations is the project manager's responsibility, and handing it to the sponsor adds no monitoring.

Question 162

In analyzing a project for monthly status reporting, the project manager notices that the schedule performance index (SPI) is 0,75 and the cost performance index (CPI) is 1,25. The project manager must provide the first project status review soon and wants to emphasize that the project is under control.

How should the project manager report the project status to key stakeholders?

  1. Prepare a detailed presentation for stakeholders on earned value including how it is calculated and the project's current earned value results
  2. Report that the project is behind schedule but that an additional experienced resource can be added to stay within schedule and maintain the budget
  3. Perform a detailed root cause analysis utilizing a pareto chart and fishbone diagrams to demonstrate that the project is under control
  4. Report that the project is not tracking as expected, but is still under control since the next project milestone is over a month away
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Report that the project is behind schedule but that an additional experienced resource can be added to stay within schedule and maintain the budget

SPI of 0.75 indicates the project is behind schedule (only 75% efficient on schedule). CPI of 1.25 shows cost efficiency. The best approach is to transparently report the schedule variance while demonstrating control by proposing a concrete solution, adding experienced resources, which addresses the root cause and shows proactive management to stakeholders.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Providing detailed EV calculations without actionable solutions doesn't address the schedule variance or reassure stakeholders.
  • C. Root cause analysis tools are useful but don't constitute the status report itself; the PM must first communicate status clearly.
  • D. Downplaying the schedule issue by referencing a future milestone is misleading and fails to communicate the actual project status transparently.

Question 163

Halfway through a project, the project sponsor is replaced by another peer who was not previously engaged in the project. The new project sponsor has rejected most of the project artifacts, and the team did not get the latest increment approved on the current iteration. Stakeholders are not feeling confident about the project outcome.

What should the project manager have done to prevent this situation?

  1. Performed a stakeholder analysis when the sponsor joined the project
  2. Held a governance meeting to review the project increment
  3. Escalated the issue to ensure the increment would be approved
  4. Conducted a product iteration review with the new project sponsor
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Performed a stakeholder analysis when the sponsor joined the project

When a new sponsor joins mid-project, the project manager should have conducted a stakeholder analysis to understand the new sponsor's expectations, communication preferences, approval criteria, and engagement level. This proactive analysis would have identified potential misalignment with project artifacts early and allowed time for alignment discussions before approval was required, preventing the conflict and loss of confidence.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. While governance meetings are important, they are reactive; they address problems after they occur rather than preventing the new sponsor's rejection through early understanding.
  • C. Escalating an approval issue does not address the root cause of misalignment with a new stakeholder and may damage relationships with the new sponsor.
  • D. Conducting an iteration review with the new sponsor after they've already rejected artifacts is too late; the damage to stakeholder confidence has occurred.

Question 164

A controller proposed a budget reduction for projects because the majority of implemented solutions resulted in little returns on investment (ROI) or operational improvements. The project manager objected and presented project assets showing all solutions having been demonstrated, accepted, and delivered within the relevant framework constraints. The project manager suggested that the issues may stem from the project evaluation and selection processes.

What was the project manager demonstrating?

  1. Multiple stages of development that members may go through toward working formations
  2. Cause-and-effect identification in root cause analysis toward achieving project value
  3. Strategic negotiation techniques in determining budget priorities in future sessions
  4. Risk management in addressing impediments, obstacles, and blockers to project success
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Cause-and-effect identification in root cause analysis toward achieving project value

The project manager identified that the real issue wasn't with project execution (all deliverables were accepted and delivered properly) but with the upstream evaluation and selection process. This demonstrates cause-and-effect identification in root cause analysis, tracing poor ROI and operational improvements back to their root cause in the project selection methodology rather than in project delivery. This type of analysis is essential for achieving sustained project value.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Team formation stages are unrelated to the budget and ROI discussion being held.
  • C. While negotiation occurs, the core issue is identifying root cause, not negotiation technique.
  • D. This is about identifying what went wrong (selection process), not managing risks to project success.

Question 165

During the sprint planning of a project, the team members have a disagreement about the comparative size of the backlog items and if they would fit into the next sprint.

Considering a hybrid approach, what should the project manager do?

  1. Ask an external technical leader to provide input and plan the sprint.
  2. Remove the items from the product backlog since the size couldn't be estimated.
  3. Facilitate the discussion so that the team members can reach a consensus.
  4. Make the decision about the backlog items based on what makes more sense.
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Facilitate the discussion so that the team members can reach a consensus.

In a hybrid approach and when team members disagree about backlog item sizing, the project manager should facilitate discussion to help the team reach consensus. This respects the team's expertise, promotes ownership of the sprint plan, and leverages collective decision-making. Facilitating consensus-building is a core responsibility in both agile and hybrid methodologies and ensures the team commits to the plan they collectively agree upon.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Bringing in an external leader undermines team authority and prevents the team from developing estimation confidence and ownership.
  • B. Removing items from the backlog because they cannot be sized is wasteful; resizing them is the appropriate action.
  • D. The project manager making unilateral decisions about backlog items removes team input and violates agile principles of self-organization and collaboration.

Question 166

A project manager is leading a project which shows a trend to exceed the cost baseline.

What should the project manager do first to manage the budget?

  1. Ask the project sponsor for assistance in getting the budget back on track
  2. Meet with the project team to analyze the actual cost to determine deviations
  3. Inform the stakeholders that the project will be finished over budget
  4. Issue a change request including the analysis to increase the budget
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Meet with the project team to analyze the actual cost to determine deviations

When a project shows a trend to exceed the cost baseline, the first action is to understand the root causes by analyzing actual costs against planned costs. Meeting with the project team to determine specific deviations allows the project manager to identify where and why overruns are occurring before taking corrective action. This analysis precedes communication to sponsors or change requests.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. Involving the sponsor prematurely, before understanding the specific cost issues, is premature escalation.
  • C. Informing stakeholders of a budget overrun before analyzing causes and exploring solutions is poor project management.
  • D. Issuing a change request to increase the budget should only occur after analyzing the variances and determining that a real budget adjustment is necessary.

Question 167

A software project using an agile approach is facing quality issues with every release, generating many production problems.

What should the project manager do to fix the problem and improve the quality?

  1. Use the retrospective meeting to better understand the root cause of the quality problems and put together a plan with the team to address the problems
  2. Hire an external company to add an additional layer of testing, making sure that the final product is well inspected before releasing
  3. Create a reward system granting incentives to the team members who are able to catch more defects
  4. Seek extra funding approval with the sponsor to replace junior team members for more experienced ones
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Use the retrospective meeting to better understand the root cause of the quality problems and put together a plan with the team to address the problems

The retrospective is the agile framework's designed mechanism for continuous improvement. By using retrospectives to identify root causes of quality problems and collaboratively developing solutions with the team, the project manager addresses systemic issues rather than symptoms. This empowers the team to own quality improvements and creates sustainable solutions aligned with agile principles.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Outsourcing testing adds cost without addressing root causes and doesn't build the team's quality awareness or capacity.
  • C. Reward systems for catching defects incentivize finding problems rather than preventing them, missing the real improvement opportunity.
  • D. Replacing team members assumes the problem is personnel capability rather than process, and ignores the knowledge and experience already invested in the team.

Question 168

A project manager has received an updated earned value analysis report. The following are the key findings from the report:

* Budget at completion = US$1 million * Earned value = US$0,7 million * Actual cost = US$0,75 million * Cost performance index = 0,933 Based on this information, what should the project manager conclude about project performance?

  1. The project will be completed exactly as planned
  2. The project will be easier to complete than planned
  3. The project will be difficult to complete as planned
  4. The project will not be completed as planned
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. The project will be difficult to complete as planned

The cost performance index (CPI) of 0.933 is less than 1.0, indicating the project is spending more money per unit of work completed than planned. With EV of $0.7M against AC of $0.75M, the project is already overrunning costs. Given that only $0.7M of $1M budget has been earned while $0.75M has been spent, the project will face difficulty completing all planned work within the original budget. This unfavorable CPI trend suggests cost overruns will continue.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A. A CPI of 0.933 indicates underperformance, not performance exactly as planned.
  • B. A CPI below 1.0 indicates the project will be harder to complete, not easier.
  • D. While this statement is directionally true, option C is more specific and directly supported by the CPI metric, which explicitly measures cost efficiency.

Question 169

The customer's project manager changes during the final stage of a project.

How can the project manager avoid a project closure delay?

  1. Update the stakeholder engagement plan
  2. Review the latest project status report and update the stakeholders
  3. Escalate the case to the customer's management team
  4. Issue the project payment invoice to the customer in advance
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Update the stakeholder engagement plan

When the customer's project manager changes, updating the stakeholder engagement plan is the most appropriate action to avoid closure delays. This plan identifies how to engage each stakeholder, and a change in the customer's PM requires adjusting strategies for engagement, communication preferences, and decision-making authority. The new PM needs to be brought into the engagement approach to ensure continuity and prevent delays in final approvals and project closure activities.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B. Reviewing status reports addresses information sharing but doesn't address the engagement strategy change needed for the new PM.
  • C. Escalating is premature and may create unnecessary tension rather than solving the transition issue.
  • D. Issuing payment invoices early is unrelated to managing the transition and could create other project management issues.

That was 169 of 741.

The full PMI PMP pack has all 741 questions, each with the answer, the explanation and why the other options are wrong, plus a questions-only copy for timed runs. US$39, paid once, with free monthly updates and a pass-or-your-money-back guarantee.

Get the full pack

Not ready yet? Get the first 708 free as one PDF by email. Get the Half Pack →